Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Who funds right wing activities in the US
Executive summary
Major funders of U.S. right‑wing activity include wealthy individual donors, conservative foundations and political action committees, and donor-advised funds that channel grants to think tanks, legal projects and advocacy outfits; one analysis found roughly $1 billion spent by right‑wing donors and foundations on voting-related efforts in 2024 [1]. Watchdog databases like OpenSecrets and FollowTheMoney track individual and organizational giving to conservative causes and campaigns [2] [3]. Coverage differs on motives and transparency: some outlets emphasize strategic, long‑term conservative philanthropy [4], while investigative reporting flags secretive donors and coordinated infrastructure builds [5].
1. Who the big players are — billionaires, foundations and donor networks
Reporting and philanthropy coverage identifies a mix of ultra‑wealthy individuals and established conservative foundations as central funders: philanthropic networks tied to the Koch movement and groups such as Stand Together continue to deploy multi‑million dollar grants for conservative policy work [4], and philanthropy trackers list dozens of ultra‑wealthy givers who are among the top political donors overall [6]. These actors often operate through private foundations or large donor networks that can underwrite think tanks, legal projects and policy campaigns [4] [6].
2. Money for policy vs. money for elections — multiple channels, different aims
Conservative funding supports both long‑term policy infrastructure (think tanks, research and Project 2025–style planning) and short‑term electoral spending. Inside philanthropy and other outlets describe strategic right‑leaning grants aimed at building policy blueprints and staffing pipelines, while election‑focused spending — including independent expenditures and targeted voting‑related projects — is tracked separately by campaign‑finance databases like OpenSecrets [4] [2]. The National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy’s research cited by The American Prospect argued roughly $1 billion flowed to groups working to influence perceptions of election integrity in 2024 [1].
3. Project 2025 and the ecosystem argument
Project 2025 is a recurring focal point: conservative organizations including The Heritage Foundation helped produce a policy roadmap that critics say coordinates personnel and policy priorities for a future administration [7]. Investigations link some donor activity and institutional funding to organizations involved in that ecosystem; critics such as the ACLU cast Project 2025 as a radical restructuring effort, while conservative outlets frame such work as policy planning and governance preparation [7] [4]. Sources disagree sharply about whether this represents legitimate policy entrepreneurship or an attempt to concentrate executive power [7] [4].
4. Secret donors and the debate over transparency
Several investigations and analyses highlight the role of less transparent vehicles — dark money groups, donor‑advised funds and non‑profit grants — in financing right‑wing projects. Mother Jones, for example, profiles “secret donors” and funding funnels that back new right‑wing institutions and litigation campaigns, arguing these channels are fueling a coordinated infrastructure [5]. Conversely, defenders of donor privacy argue disclosure rules implicate free speech and could chill charitable giving; OpenSecrets and FollowTheMoney provide public tools intended to increase visibility but cannot capture every private philanthropic dollar [2] [3] [5].
5. What watchdogs and databases can (and cannot) show
Databases such as OpenSecrets and FollowTheMoney compile FEC and state filings to reveal campaign contributions and independent expenditures, while philanthropy outlets and investigative reporters parse Form 990s and grant records to expose foundation giving patterns [2] [3] [4]. But available sources note limits: charitable giving, donor‑advised fund flows and some non‑profit grants do not appear with the same granularity as federal campaign reports, so total influence can be hard to quantify precisely [2] [4] [5].
6. Competing interpretations — strategy, influence or threat?
Analysts and advocacy groups frame the same funding in competing ways: Inside Philanthropy describes conservative donors as building policy capacity and philanthropic strategies [4], while outlets like Mother Jones and the ACLU warn that concentrated, sometimes opaque funding is underwriting an authoritarian‑leaning policy agenda and litigation campaigns [5] [7]. Both perspectives rely on the same funding patterns but differ on intent and democratic risk, so readers should weigh motive, transparency and downstream activity when judging impact [4] [5] [7].
7. How to follow the money if you want to dig deeper
Public tools are the starting point: OpenSecrets’ donor and organization lookups offer federal filing–based detail on top donors and recipients; FollowTheMoney aggregates state‑level contribution records [2] [3]. For grants to nonprofits and foundations, Inside Philanthropy and investigative pieces give context and tiemakers between donors and policy projects [4] [5]. Use these resources to trace repeated funding patterns, cross‑check Form 990s and note where reporting highlights opaque channels not fully visible in public filings [2] [4] [5].
Limitations: reporting and databases cited here document major funders and mechanisms but cannot fully quantify every private gift or donor‑advised flow; some assertions about donor intent are contested among the sources cited [1] [4] [5].