Who has had access to Donald Trump's medical records and what do they show?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Donald Trump’s medical records are controlled by his doctors and the White House; what has been publicly released are limited memos and summaries from White House Physician Dr. Sean Barbabella and the administration stating Trump’s April 2025 executive physical found him “in excellent health” and that an October MRI of his cardiovascular and abdominal systems was “perfectly normal” [1] [2] [3]. Critics and some medical professionals continue to press for broader release of full medical records; petitions and public calls followed disclosures such as a chronic venous insufficiency diagnosis and visible bruising and swelling [4] [5] [6].
1. Who has had access: White House physicians and Walter Reed staff
The sources show the examinations in 2025 were performed by the White House physician and at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center; the memos and summaries released publicly came from White House Physician Sean Barbabella and White House press officials, indicating those clinicians and military medical staff are the ones with direct access to the underlying records [1] [3] [7].
2. What has been released publicly: memos, summaries and selective imaging results
The administration released a short memorandum after the April 2025 physical and later a memo and press statements about October MRI imaging; those public documents reported a perfect 30/30 on a Montreal Cognitive Assessment, “excellent health” in the April physical, and “perfectly normal” cardiovascular and abdominal MRI results in October [1] [2] [3] [7].
3. What the released records actually show — the key findings
Publicly disclosed items include: an April 2025 assessment concluding Trump was in “excellent health” and “fully fit” to serve; a 30/30 score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment; a diagnosis the White House later acknowledged of chronic venous insufficiency to explain leg swelling and bruising; and an October MRI described by the White House as showing normal cardiovascular and abdominal imaging [2] [6] [8] [3].
4. What has not been released: full charts, notes and historical records
Multiple sources emphasize that detailed medical records beyond the memos have not been released. Reporting and advocacy groups note Trump declined to publish comprehensive medical records going back years; critics say the public has only “snippets” and summaries rather than full charts, doctors’ notes or longitudinal health data [9] [4] [5]. Available sources do not mention the full medical chart being public [9].
5. Why access matters: who can see private records and why disclosure is political
By law and medical practice, a patient’s full records are controlled by treating clinicians and the patient; for a sitting president, White House physicians and military hospital staff hold those records, but releasing them publicly requires the president’s consent. Reporting shows the White House has chosen to publish short memos rather than full files, and that decision has been treated as a political choice that fuels scrutiny and petitions demanding transparency [1] [9] [4].
6. Competing interpretations: reassurances from doctors vs. concern from critics
The White House physician and administration representatives have presented the exams as confirming robust cardiac, pulmonary, neurological and general physical function and “perfectly normal” imaging [7] [3]. Medical professionals and political critics counter that short memos do not substitute for full records and that visible bruising and swelling — and the later chronic venous insufficiency disclosure — merit deeper documentation and explanation [6] [4] [5].
7. What the public can and cannot conclude from available documents
From the released memos one can conclude that the administration’s physicians reported no acute or chronic imaging abnormalities in the specific MRI scans released and that Trump scored perfectly on a screening cognitive test [2] [7]. One cannot conclude from available public reporting that there are no other health concerns; sources explicitly note the absence of full records and the longstanding refusal to release more comprehensive documentation [9] [4].
8. Transparency pressure and next steps to watch
Expect continued public pressure — petitions, calls by clinicians and political opponents — for fuller disclosure, especially after the chronic venous insufficiency admission and periodic visible signs (bruises, swelling) that sparked concern [4] [6]. The administration’s pattern so far has been to disclose selective memos rather than full charts; future releases, if any, likely will come from the White House physician or through a presidential decision to authorize broader disclosure [1] [9].
Limitations: this analysis uses only the provided reporting; available sources do not mention release of full medical charts or third‑party audits of the records beyond the White House memos [1] [9].