Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Who is leading in latest polls for democratic nomination for 2028
Executive Summary
The most recent crop of publicly surfaced polls places Pete Buttigieg at the top of early 2028 Democratic primary matchups, with roughly 19% support in New Hampshire–focused polling, followed by Gavin Newsom at about 15% and Alexandria Ocasio‑Cortez near 14%. These results come from multiple releases dated October 27–28, 2025, but they reflect early, state‑level snapshots—not national consensus—and pollsters and outlets stress that no candidate holds a decisive, broad-based lead [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. Why the New Hampshire Numbers Are Getting Headlines — and What They Actually Measure
The October 27–28, 2025 polling pushed in multiple reports centers on New Hampshire and similar early-state testing, which is why headlines emphasize Buttigieg’s 19% lead and accompanying favorable metrics. The University of New Hampshire/Granite State results are presented as a top-line ranking of likely Democratic primary voters, showing Buttigieg first, Newsom second, and Ocasio‑Cortez third [1] [2] [3]. These polls explicitly measure likely primary voters in specific states, not a nationwide Democratic electorate, and pollsters caution that early-state advantages reflect name recognition, regional organization, and localized messaging rather than definitive national momentum [4] [5]. The polls’ timing—late October 2025—means they capture a fluid moment in a long nominating calendar, where shifts in endorsements, fundraising, and candidate decisions could rapidly change the field.
2. Consistency Across Polls — Signals and Limits
Multiple outlets reported similar top‑three ordering, lending consistency to the immediate narrative: Buttigieg, Newsom, Ocasio‑Cortez. The Granite State Poll and associated University of New Hampshire releases replicated the 19/15/14 split, and reporting notes alignment with earlier Emerson College and AtlasIntel snapshots referenced by the same stories [2] [5]. Consistency across polls strengthens the claim that these three figures are the primary names circulating among engaged Democratic primary voters at this early stage. However, the magnitude of support is modest—single digits or high teens—meaning the field is fragmented and the race is subject to volatility. Polling margins, likely‑voter screens, and cross‑state differences are omitted in many headlines, which inflates the impression of a stable frontrunner when actual leads are narrow [1] [4].
3. What Buttigieg’s Favorability Numbers Mean for the Contest
Poll reports include a striking metric: an 81% favorable rating for Pete Buttigieg among likely Democratic primary voters in the surveyed sample. High favorability can translate into durability if sustained, but it also reflects the limited, engaged cohort measured in early‑state polling. Favorability matters for persuasion and turnout among the party base; yet, high favorability in one state does not guarantee a national coalition, particularly when other potential contenders show concentrated support among different party constituencies or geographic bases [1]. The presence of multiple viable top-tier names suggests coalition-building and primary strategy will matter more than any transient lead reflected in these specific polls.
4. Alternative Readings and Caveats Reporters Often Miss
Analysts noted the same polls do not show a decisive, broad-based nominee, and emphasize the non-generalizability of New Hampshire results to the national Democratic electorate. Even pollsters and outlets publishing these numbers warned that early-state dynamics can exaggerate candidates with superior ground games in those states or stronger local name recognition [4] [5]. The datasets referenced by the stories do not appear to include full national toplines, and some source fragments in the record are unrelated to polling, underscoring the need to treat selected headlines as partial [6] [7] [8]. Readers should expect substantial shifts as more national and multistate polling arrives, as candidates declare, and as the field winnows.
5. Who’s Reporting and What Their Interests Might Be
The primary information comes through state poll releases and news outlets that amplify early‑state findings, which creates incentive to frame a clear “frontrunner” narrative. The reports reference the University of New Hampshire and Granite State Polls and note corroboration from Emerson College and AtlasIntel; those institutions have established reputations for early‑state polling but also rely on small samples and different likely‑voter screens [2] [5]. Media organizations often run attractive, headline‑friendly angles and may focus on names with existing national profiles to draw attention. That editorial dynamic can produce an impression of solidity around a leader even when poll margins are thin and the electorate sampled is narrow.
6. Bottom Line: Trending but Not Decisive — What To Watch Next
Current late‑October 2025 polling shows Buttigieg leading early Democratic primary testing in New Hampshire with 19%, ahead of Newsom and Ocasio‑Cortez, but the numbers represent early, state‑specific snapshots rather than a settled national race [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. The absence of a decisive plurality, the fragmentation of support, and the limits of early‑state sampling mean the headline frontrunner designation should be viewed as tentative. Observers should watch for broader national polls, candidate announcements, fundraising and organizing metrics, and subsequent releases from diverse pollsters to judge whether these early leads translate into sustained national advantage.