Who voted to block the epstein file release on 11/12/2025?

1. What the sources actually claim about a vote on 11/12/2025 — Republicans blocked release, Democrats supported it

The most direct factual claim in the collected analyses is that a Senate vote occurred on 11/12/2025 in which Republican senators voted against releasing the Epstein files and Democratic senators voted in favor, with Sen. Dick Durbin named in the supporting majority ^[1]. This is a categorical statement presented as the outcome of a Senate procedural or substantive vote on document release. The dataset contains no Senate roll‑call list naming every senator and their individual votes; instead the claim is presented at the party level ^[1]. This party‑line framing is the strongest unequivocal assertion available in the provided materials.

2. House activity is a distinct track — discharge petition succeeded but did not itself enumerate blockers

Several analyses describe a separate House process: a discharge petition that gathered the 218 signatures necessary to force consideration of releasing Epstein‑related files, including a mix of Democrats and a small number of Republicans (notably Thomas Massie, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace) ^{[2] [3] [4]}. Those sources emphasize that the petition’s success triggered a scheduled House vote; they do not say that a House vote on 11/12/2025 produced a roll‑call of who blocked the release. Instead, the House material frames the dispute as an ongoing standoff between House Democratic proponents and House Republican leadership, with implication—but not a named list—that many Republicans opposed bringing the files into the open via other pathways ^{[2] [3] [4]}.

3. Where the reporting diverges — Senate versus House and missing roll‑calls

The dataset reveals a clear divergence in focus and completeness: one analysis asserts a Senate vote against release on 11/12/2025 ^[1], while the House‑focused analyses document procedural maneuvers and signatures without providing explicit vote tallies for that date ^{[2] [3] [4]}. Additional source attempts encountered access errors or blockages that prevented retrieval of a detailed roll call, leaving a gap between the claim of a Senate party‑line vote and the absence of comprehensive member‑by‑member records in the House materials ^{[5] [6]}. This produces an incomplete public picture in the provided corpus: the party outcome is stated for the Senate, but granular voting records for either chamber are not included.

4. Political context and named actors — leaders, signatories, and pressure points

The analyses identify specific actors shaping events: House members who signed the discharge petition (Massie, Greene, Boebert, Mace) and party leaders opposing release efforts, including House Speaker Mike Johnson and former President Donald Trump, who reportedly urged Republican signees to withdraw support ^{[3] [4]}. In the Senate framing, Sen. Dick Durbin is highlighted as a Democratic spokesman for release ^[1]. These named individuals signal both the bipartisan procedural complexity and political pressure surrounding document release, but the materials stop short of linking every named actor to an explicit vote on 11/12/2025.

5. What is missing — the exact roll‑call and member‑level accountability

Across the materials the decisive missing element is a contemporaneous, publicly cited roll‑call list showing which specific lawmakers voted on a motion to release Epstein files on 11/12/2025. Some analyses infer that the bulk of Republicans who did not sign the House petition functionally blocked release and that Senate Republicans voted against release ^{[3] [1]}, but a full, verifiable member‑by‑member tally for that date is not present in the provided sources, and attempts to retrieve more detailed reporting were met with access errors ^{[5] [6]}. That lack prevents definitive attribution of the blocking votes to a named set of legislators beyond the party‑level statements.

6. Bottom line and recommended next steps for verification

The materials collectively support the conclusion that Republicans in the Senate opposed releasing the Epstein files on 11/12/2025 while Senate Democrats voted to release, and that in the House the dispute continued through a successful discharge petition backed by Democrats and a few Republicans ^{[1] [2] [4]}. To move from party‑level claims to precise accountability, obtain the official Senate roll call for 11/12/2025 and the House Journal or congressional clerk’s record for votes and procedural actions in mid‑November; the provided dataset lacks those document‑level roll calls ^{[5] [6]}. Only a verified roll‑call transcript or clerk’s certificate will enable naming every lawmaker who voted to block the release.