Why did former President Trump's doctor resign and what reasons were given?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Former President Trump’s White House physician, Captain Sean P. Barbabella, issued memos in 2025 saying Trump’s “advanced imaging” and executive physical showed him to be in “excellent overall health” and “perfectly normal” cardiovascular and abdominal imaging [1] [2]. Reporting notes confusion about what specific tests were done — Trump said “an M.R.I.” but the physician’s memos did not specify MRI — and some medical experts called the public statements vague [3] [4].
1. What happened: a doctor’s memo and public confusion
The White House released formal memoranda from its physician asserting that advanced imaging of the president’s heart and abdomen were “perfectly normal” and that the president “remains in excellent overall health” [1] [2]. Those memos did not explicitly name the imaging modality, even as the president told reporters he had “an M.R.I.”; that mismatch has been widely flagged by journalists and clinicians as creating uncertainty about what was actually scanned and why [3].
2. Why the doctor’s wording mattered: clarity versus reassurance
Dr. Barbabella’s language — calling the scans “standard for an executive physical” and describing systems as “functioning within normal limits” — aims to reassure the public about fitness for office [1]. But medical commentators said the memo “offers little clarity” because it omitted details clinicians normally provide about which tests were done, indications for testing, or specific measurements; that lack of detail fuels questions rather than settles them [3].
3. Competing explanations in medical commentary
Medical commentators put forward two plausible explanations: either the imaging was routine, part of a comprehensive executive physical, or it was follow-up for an incidental or prior finding that warranted further study [4]. One clinician-writer suggested the scans could represent overuse of high-end imaging for reassurance — common among wealthy or high-profile patients — or targeted follow-up where incidental findings are likely and ultimately benign [4].
4. The president’s own statements and their consequences
Mr. Trump publicly described the episode differently — saying he had “an M.R.I.” and later calling the results the “best” his doctor had ever seen [3] [5]. That public characterization, when not mirrored by the physician’s memo, heightened reporting scrutiny and prompted calls from other officials and commentators for fuller disclosure of the results or test type [3].
5. Why some observers pressed for more transparency
Observers including governors and reporters asked for more detailed release because the physician’s brief assurances do not answer questions about what was examined and why, especially given the president’s age and prior annual physicals [3]. The gap between the president’s description and the memo’s wording left space for speculation about the nature of the tests and the clinical reasoning for ordering them [3] [4].
6. Alternative viewpoints and institutional incentives
The White House stance is to provide succinct reassurance that an elected leader is fit for duty, prioritizing public calm [2]. Medical experts counter that clinical transparency — naming tests, indications and key findings — better serves public trust in a chief executive’s health; some physicians framed the memos as clinically insufficient even if not deceptive [3] [4].
7. Limitations of available reporting
Available sources describe the memos, the president’s comments and expert reaction but do not give a definitive listing of which scans were performed or the full clinical record; the White House documents do not specify MRI results even though the president said he had one, and detailed clinical data are not disclosed in current reporting [3] [2]. Therefore, definitive answers about the tests’ exact nature or why they were ordered are not found in current reporting.
8. What to watch next
Future clarity would come from either a more detailed physician’s report naming the imaging modality and reasons for testing, or publication of clinical test results; until then reporting will hinge on reconciling the physician’s memos with the president’s own statements and on expert interpretation of what “advanced imaging” typically entails for an executive physical [1] [3] [4].