Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Why do so many republicans love trump despite the fact that he constantly lies
Executive Summary
Many Republicans’ continued support for Donald Trump despite widespread reporting of his falsehoods is driven by a mix of psychological identity fusion, negative partisanship, media ecosystems that prioritize his narrative, and selective trust in his information over institutions; multiple recent studies and polls document these dynamics and their political consequences [1] [2] [3]. Evidence shows that identity fusion with Trump predisposes followers to accept misinformation and that partisan anger toward opponents reinforces loyalty even when claims are demonstrably false [1] [2] [4]. Recent empirical work from 2024–2025 connects these mechanisms to concretely measured outcomes: belief in the “big lie,” lower defections to Democrats, and willingness to downplay legal and ethical transgressions [1].
1. Why identity becomes allegiance: the psychological mechanics that bind supporters to a leader
Scholarly panels and peer-reviewed articles document a robust link between identity fusion and the absorption of a leader’s false claims, showing that fusion predating an election predicts increasing commitment and belief in misinformation afterward. A three-wave panel of Trump supporters tracked from 2020 through 2024 found that those who were more fused before the 2020 election were more likely to internalize the “big lie” about fraud, and that accepting that narrative further cemented fusion with Trump while reducing sensitivity to his criminal charges [1]. This research, published in PS: Political Science & Politics in 2025, presents a feedback loop: identity fusion makes individuals receptive to misinformation, and embracing misinformation deepens fusion, producing reciprocal reinforcement that explains persistent loyalty despite repeated falsehoods [1].
2. Negative partisanship: loyalty forged by opposition, not affection
Surveys and analytic pieces from 2023–2024 show that negative partisanship—an intense dislike of the opposing party—drives sustained support for leaders perceived as the bulwark against political foes. Analysts report that Republican voters interpret attacks from Democrats and mainstream media as evidence of partisan warfare against Trump, which paradoxically strengthens their allegiance, lowering rates of crossover and keeping Trump competitive despite legal challenges and credibility issues [2] [4]. Polling from 2024 underscores that many Republicans trust Trump’s account of events more than official government-certified results, revealing a substitution of personal or partisan information channels for institutional trust; this substitution amplifies the partisan feedback loop and shields supporters from corrective facts [3].
3. Personality traits and the disciplined base: why some traits correlate with loyalty
Recent research in Political Psychology suggests parts of Trump’s base share personality traits—notably high Conscientiousness—that correlate with steadfast loyalty. Studies comparing 2021 and 2016 samples find that disciplined, rule-oriented psychological profiles can coexist with support for an unconventional leader when supporters view him as enforcing their priorities or rebuking elites [5]. This framing complicates the view that loyalty is purely irrational: some supporters prioritize perceived effectiveness, order, or cultural affirmation, and therefore rationalize or overlook dishonesty when they believe the leader advances their goals. The study cautions against one-size-fits-all labels, showing that structural personality differences can help explain why certain voters remain committed even in the face of repeated falsehoods [5].
4. Local reporting and attitudes on the ground: interviews that reveal rationalization and pragmatism
On-the-ground reporting from Ohio and other swing areas finds supporters openly acknowledging false claims but either explaining them away or valuing the disruptive politics that produced tangible policy outcomes. Interviews in 2016-era Trump strongholds show voters who describe discomfort with his rhetoric but simultaneously praise his willingness to challenge the establishment, interpreting lies as tactical or overblown rather than disqualifying [6]. Media ecosystems that amplify partisan narratives create alternative reality bubbles where institutional counters to falsehoods carry less weight, and many voters place trust in partisan communication channels and campaign messaging over neutral fact checks, reinforcing durable support [6] [3].
5. Consequences and competing interpretations: what this loyalty means for democracy and for political strategy
Researchers warn that identity-driven acceptance of falsehoods has downstream effects: it normalizes dismissing legal accountability, increases tolerance for antidemocratic policy proposals, and narrows partisan defections—outcomes with measurable implications for electoral dynamics and governance [1]. Yet analysts also note nuance: not all Republicans are fused or unconcerned about honesty; some remain skeptical yet prioritize partisan outcomes or policy alignment over leaders’ veracity. Observers with differing agendas—scholars emphasizing civic risk versus pundits highlighting pragmatic voter calculations—use the same data to frame either an urgent threat to democratic norms or a rational electoral coalition; both readings are rooted in the empirical patterns documented above [1] [2].