Is donald trump and donald trump jr assests going to be frozen in ten days if they dont pay their judgement in full

Checked on January 12, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

A New York appeals court has paused active collection of the more than $454 million civil fraud judgment against Donald Trump — but only if he posts a $175 million bond within 10 days; failure to post that bond would allow state enforcement efforts to resume, which could include seizure actions, though the exact mechanics and timing of any asset freezes are not detailed in the reporting [1]. The judgment itself remains in force while the appeals process continues, and co-defendants including Donald Trump Jr. face smaller sums that are likewise stayed if the bond is posted [1] [2].

1. What the court actually ordered and the 10‑day deadline

An appeals court ordered that collection of the $454 million judgment be held in abeyance on condition that Donald Trump post a $175 million bond within 10 days; if he meets that condition, the state’s ability to seize assets to satisfy the judgment is paused while the appeal proceeds [1]. The ruling also reversed portions of a prior trial judge’s injunction barring Trump and his sons from serving in corporate leadership for years, and placed the smaller monetary obligations of co-defendants, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, on the same conditional hold if the bond is posted [1].

2. Does “not paying in full” automatically mean immediate asset freezes?

Not under the appeals court’s conditional order as reported: the court did not set a binary “pay in full or assets frozen in 10 days” decree; instead it provided a route — posting a $175 million bond — to stay collection actions for the duration of appeal, meaning that failure to post the bond would remove that protective pause and allow New York officials to pursue collection remedies that they have signaled could include seizure of assets [1]. Reporting notes that Attorney General Letitia James said she would seek to seize assets if Trump lacks funds to pay, but she did not publicly spell out the precise seizure process or which holdings she would target [1].

3. What “seize assets” could mean — and what reporting does not show

The phrase “seize assets” is used by the attorney general’s office and media reports as the natural next enforcement step if collection resumes, but the reporting does not specify which assets would be targeted or the timing and legal steps required to freeze particular accounts or properties [1]. The state has taken a technical step by filing notice of the judgment, which is a preliminary procedural move toward potential collection, but notice alone is not an immediate freeze order and would be followed by additional legal actions if collection is pursued [1].

4. Co‑defendants and the scope of financial exposure

Donald Trump Jr. and others were assessed far smaller amounts in the original judgment and those assessments were also put on hold by the appeals court’s conditional stay if the $175 million bond is posted, meaning a single bond could protect multiple defendants from immediate enforcement while appeals continue [1]. Background on the underlying civil fraud suit — alleging long-running inflation of asset values and resulting in a September 2023 summary judgment finding fraud by Trump and the organization — provides context for why the damages are substantial, but the appellate stay is focused on procedure rather than re-litigating those findings [2].

5. Bottom line and limits of available reporting

The bottom line: if the $175 million bond is posted within 10 days, New York’s collection will be paused; if it is not posted, the state can resume enforcement which could include asset seizures, but the specific assets, timeline, and legal steps for freezing property are not enumerated in the reporting and thus cannot be described as an automatic freeze exactly “in ten days” [1]. Sources do not provide a definitive step‑by‑step enforcement calendar or a list of targeted holdings, so any claim that assets will be frozen on a precise date absent the bond would exceed what the reporting supports [1] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What legal mechanisms can New York use to seize assets after a civil judgment is upheld on appeal?
How have past high‑profile civil judgments been enforced when defendants appealed without posting a bond?
Which Trump Organization assets have liens, mortgages, or encumbrances that could affect New York’s ability to seize them?