Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the names of the women who accused Joe Biden of sexual misconduct?
Executive Summary
Tara Reade is the primary woman who has accused Joe Biden of sexual assault, alleging an incident in 1993 while she worked in his Senate office; she and the Biden campaign have made competing claims about what was alleged and whether contemporaneous complaints exist [1] [2]. A separate set of women publicly described unwanted touching or inappropriate affection by Biden — a lump-sum category that includes several named accusers and differs in severity and detail from Reade’s allegation [3] [4]. The public record therefore comprises one assault allegation with contested corroboration and multiple other accounts of non-consensual touching, with divergent narratives, campaign denials, and inconsistent corroborative evidence across sources [5] [6].
1. The central allegation everyone cites — who is Tara Reade and what did she say?
Tara Reade, a former Senate staffer, publicly alleged that Joe Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993; her account evolved over time and included both a later explicit description of alleged penetration with a finger and a contemporaneous personnel complaint she later said used the words “uncomfortable” and “retaliation” but did not explicitly allege assault [2] [6]. Reade filed a police report later in the timeline, and reporting has found varying degrees of corroboration from friends and family alongside denials or non-recollection from some former colleagues; the Biden campaign has consistently denied the assault allegation, saying it “never, never happened” [1] [2]. The factual record is a mix of Reade’s later public recounting, the campaign’s denials, and investigative findings that both support and question elements of her narrative [1] [2].
2. A cluster of women described unwanted touching — different charge, different context
Separate from Reade’s claim, multiple women publicly described experiences of unwanted touching, hugging, or kissing by Biden that they found uncomfortable; these accounts were collected in 2019–2020 and include named individuals such as Lucy Flores, Amy Lappos, D.J. Hill, Caitlyn Caruso, Ally Coll, Sofie Karasek, and Vail Kohnert-Yount alongside others who described similar conduct [3] [4]. These statements were not framed as allegations of sexual assault in the way Reade’s allegation was, and they were presented as patterns of conduct over years rather than a single criminal incident. The public conversation around these accounts focused on norms of physicality, evolving standards of consent, and whether the conduct described amounted to misconduct warranting further action [3] [4].
3. How news outlets and investigators treated corroboration and timing disputes
Reporting shows disputes over corroboration: some of Reade’s friends and family reportedly corroborated parts of her story, while former Biden staffers did not recall complaints of harassment, and documents such as the personnel complaint are described differently across sources—some say it did not explicitly allege assault, others relay Reade’s claim about the complaint’s wording [1] [2]. Investigations and fact checks noted Reade’s account changed in detail over time and that contemporaneous documentary evidence is limited or ambiguous; this created divergent interpretations among journalists, political advocates, and legal analysts about the credibility and significance of the allegations [1] [6].
4. Campaign responses, political framing, and advocacy reactions
The Biden campaign has unequivocally denied the assault allegation and pushed back against characterizations that equate the Reade allegation with more numerous but less severe touching complaints, while supporters framed the touching accounts as cultural, non-criminal missteps and opponents emphasized them to question fitness for office [2] [5]. Advocacy groups and commentators debated whether publicizing the range of accounts advanced #MeToo-era accountability or risked conflating different kinds of conduct; some legal and academic commentators urged careful fact-finding and distinction between assault and inappropriate touching [7] [5]. These differing framings reflect expected political incentives: denials and mitigation from the campaign, amplification from critics, and procedural caution from neutral analysts [2] [7].
5. Bottom line — names, distinctions, and what remains unsettled
The clearest single name tied to a sexual-assault allegation is Tara Reade, with contested corroboration and campaign denial; the roster of women who described unwanted touching includes Lucy Flores, Amy Lappos, D.J. Hill, Caitlyn Caruso, Ally Coll, Sofie Karasek, and Vail Kohnert-Yount among others, and these accounts are separate in nature from Reade’s claim [3] [2]. Important unresolved facts include the precise content of any contemporaneous complaint Reade filed, the degree to which colleagues recall relevant events, and how to interpret a cluster of touching allegations in light of evolving social norms; public sources document the accusations and denials but leave aspects of corroboration and timing disputed [1] [2].