Would reform party policy help or harm young people?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Reform’s appeal to young people is real but mixed: polls show Reform polling as high as 23% among 25–34s and 16% among 18–24s in some surveys [1], while other polling and analysts place Reform behind Labour and the Greens among under‑30s [2] [3]. The party promises youth‑focused measures — training camps, inquiries into social media harms and a “platform for Gen Z” — but critics and some polls warn its economic and social policies, plus populist messaging, may not address young people’s material needs [4] [5] [6].
1. What Reform is saying to young people — a direct pitch
Reform’s leadership openly targets younger voters with rhetoric about “remoralising” youth, offering a “policy platform for Gen Z and millennials,” and promising changes such as inquiries into social media harms and high‑intensity training camps aimed at education, teamwork and values [5] [4]. The party frames itself as an anti‑establishment alternative to mainstream politics and emphasises patriotism and disciplinary responses to perceived cultural problems in schools [5].
2. Early signs of traction — polling and campus organisation
There are measurable gains: local polling showed Reform support peaking at 23% among 25–34‑year‑olds and 16% for 18–24s in May 2025 [1]. Student societies and campus organisers describe recruitment successes and rapid promotion of young members into leadership, suggesting an organisational pipeline from campuses into the party [7].
3. Counterevidence — youth remain divided and often lean left
Multiple sources show a more complex picture: broader surveys find Labour and the Greens still lead many under‑30 cohorts, and academic analysis highlights low youth turnout and issue mismatches that have limited the right’s youth appeal historically [2] [3]. Some YouGov and other polling snapshots even record sharp, rapid falls in youth support for figures associated with Reform, illustrating volatility [6].
4. Which young people are most attracted — the socioeconomic slice
Research and segmentation show that Reform’s youth support is not uniform: groups labelled as “contrarian youth” or those anxious about finances are overrepresented in Reform’s base, while concerns like immigration resonate differently across subgroups [8]. One study found a large proportion of Reform supporters report being desperate or worried about finances — a vulnerability that can drive attraction to populist solutions [8].
5. Policies that could help young people — where Reform claims to act
Reform’s manifesto proposals highlighted for younger voters include a review of online safety laws and an inquiry into social media harms, plus schemes such as High Intensity Training Camps to teach basic skills and teamwork [4]. If implemented with adequate funding and oversight, targeted interventions on mental health and digital safety could address real youth concerns [4].
6. Policies that could harm young people — economic and social trade‑offs
Critics argue Reform’s broader economic and social stances could leave core youth problems unaddressed. Analyses suggest young people prioritise jobs, housing and health; some reporting contends Reform’s platform lacks credible plans to solve those material problems and may instead emphasise cultural issues or market‑tilted policies that benefit property interests [6] [3]. Available sources do not mention specific quantitative projections of harm to young people under Reform policy; therefore fiscal impacts are not provided here (not found in current reporting).
7. Messaging and media strategy — why youth attention matters
Observers note Reform’s strength on social media and narrative framing: the party’s content strategy and charismatic figures amplify reach among young audiences, sometimes independent of detailed policy substance [9]. That makes short‑term gains likely but also exposes youth support to rapid swings when leaders or messaging come under scrutiny [6].
8. Competing remedies — what alternative approaches are being proposed
Sources advocating to curb Reform’s rise recommend addressing the root causes of youth disaffection: more investment in public services, tackling poverty, expanded education and job opportunities, and better housing policy — approaches emphasised by commentators and the Greens and Labour‑aligned voices as the route to undercut populist appeal [10] [3].
9. Bottom line for young people deciding whether Reform helps or harms
For some young people — particularly those frustrated with mainstream parties, worried about identity and security, or attracted to strong cultural messaging — Reform offers clear, headline policies and a sense of agency [5] [8]. For others whose priorities are housing, jobs and welfare, available reporting suggests Reform’s record and manifesto leave doubts about whether it offers practical solutions; critics warn cultural focus and market‑friendly instincts could exacerbate material insecurity [6] [3].
Limitations: this analysis uses the provided reporting and polling snapshots; detailed economic modelling and longitudinal youth‑attitude panels are not in the supplied sources and thus are not covered here (not found in current reporting).