Are archived versions (Wayback/archives) or screenshots available for Zohran Mamdani's 9/11 comment?

1. What the contemporary coverage preserved: quotes and social-media reactions, not necessarily original archive captures

Multiple outlets summarized and quoted Mamdani’s speech — for example, 19th News recounted his description of a “well-meaning Muslim uncle” advising him to downplay his religion after 9/11 and noted conservative mockery on X, including a JD Vance post ^[1]. The Hill and other outlets similarly reported Mamdani’s public rebuttals to other candidates and contextualized his comments within campaign back-and-forth ^[2]. Those mainstream reports constitute contemporaneous documentation of the comment, but they are secondary publications quoting the speech rather than explicit archival captures of an original video or social post ^{[1] [2]}.

2. Social posts and screenshots were invoked by reporters but not shown as archived pages in the supplied sources

Reporting indicates that conservatives “turned to social media to mock the speech” and that specific posts circulated in reaction ^[1]. The New Yorker’s reporting about the campaign environment also references screenshots being shared in the campaign ecosystem, but that refers to campaign imagery more broadly rather than a preserved Wayback or archive.org snapshot of the 9/11 comment itself ^[3]. None of the provided sources include a link to an Internet Archive/Wayback Machine capture or an archive.is snapshot of the original clip or post containing the 9/11 comment ^{[1] [3]}.

3. What this implies about “available archives or screenshots”

Given the evidence in these reports, a reader can reliably find contemporaneous news accounts that quote Mamdani’s wording and report on how commentators reacted — those articles operate as a public record of the comment ^{[1] [2]}. The supplied material does not, however, supply direct evidence that an archival capture (Wayback, archive.org, archive.is) or a publicly posted screenshot of the original moment has been preserved and linked by reporters; absence of such a citation in these sources means the existence of a specific archive or screenshot cannot be confirmed from this reporting alone ^{[1] [3]}.

4. Alternative pathways reporters used and why they matter

Reporters and commentators frequently rely on embedded video, quoted text, or screenshots when primary-source posts disappear or are deleted; the pieces here demonstrate that pattern, with outlets quoting Mamdani and describing social-media responses ^[1]. That practice creates durable accounts of what was said even when an original post is later removed, but it does not substitute for a named archived URL or image file when a researcher specifically needs an independent preserved copy ^{[1] [3]}.

5. Best next steps based on what reporting does and does not show

To definitively locate a Wayback/Internet Archive capture or a screenshot, further searching beyond the provided reporting is required: check the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine for any candidate URLs, review archive.is for saved snapshots, and search social platforms (X and others) for cached screenshots or video reposts that reporters referenced ^{[1] [3]}. The supplied sources suggest the comment was widely reported and reacted to, but they do not point to a preserved archive link that can be cited directly here ^{[1] [2]}.

6. Conclusion — direct answer to the question

The materials provided document the speech and social-media reactions to Mamdani’s 9/11 comment through media reporting and reposts ^{[1] [2] [3]}, but they do not demonstrate the existence of a specific Wayback/archives.org snapshot or a publicly linked screenshot of the original comment; therefore, based on the supplied reporting, an archived Wayback/archives capture or explicit screenshot cannot be confirmed ^{[1] [3]}.