Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Has Zohran Mamdani ever expressed support for Hamas or extremist groups?
Executive Summary
Zohran Mamdani has been accused in some outlets and by political opponents of showing sympathy for Hamas, but the factual record is mixed: past artistic references and campaign funding links have been cited as evidence, while debate statements and multiple fact-checks and reports find no clear endorsement of Hamas or extremist organizations. The most reliable, recent reporting shows a combination of a decade-old lyric mentioning the Holy Land Five, campaign donations from controversial groups, debate remarks urging Hamas to disarm, and widespread online misinformation — no definitive evidence of explicit organizational support exists in the public record as of early November 2025 [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Old Lyrics Resurface and Spark Claims — What Was Said and When
A 2017 rap track by Mamdani contains a line referencing the “Holy Land Five,” a group convicted in 2008 for providing material support to Hamas, and that lyric resurfaced in reporting on his 2025 campaign, prompting allegations of praise; the October 8, 2025 article specifically cites the line “My love to the Holy Land Five, you better look 'em up” as the basis for claims that he “praised Hamas” [1]. That lyric is factual and public, and the Holy Land Five conviction is a settled legal matter; the key contextual question is whether a single artistic line from 2017 constitutes an endorsement of a designated terrorist organization, a determination reporters and fact-checkers note requires nuance and additional context about intent and subsequent statements [1].
2. Campaign Funding Allegations and the Limits of Inference
Reports that Mamdani received substantial campaign contributions tied to CAIR, described by some as under congressional scrutiny for alleged Hamas links, have fueled suspicion; a mentor’s comment that CAIR gave $120,000 to his campaign was reported on November 4, 2025, and raised questions about judgment in fundraising choices [2]. Accepting funds from an organization that is itself controversial or under investigation does not in itself equal operational support for Hamas or an endorsement of extremism, and concrete evidence linking those funds to extremist activity has not been produced in the reporting supplied; therefore the donations are a legitimate subject of scrutiny but not proof of support for terrorist groups [2].
3. Public Statements Under Scrutiny — Debate Answers and Policy Positions
In October 2025 debates Mamdani publicly stated that Hamas should “lay down their arms,” a direct repudiation of continued armed action, while also criticizing Israel’s conduct and calling for a ceasefire and humanitarian aid, framing the conflict in terms of occupation and apartheid; multiple reports from mid-October capture this nuance and the resulting political friction with opponents who questioned his ability to represent Jewish New Yorkers [3] [5]. Those debate remarks are important because they constitute a contemporary, on-the-record distancing from violent tactics, yet critics cite earlier evasions on specific language and past rhetoric as evidence of ambivalence, illustrating how political opponents and media outlets select different elements to build competing narratives [3].
4. Misinformation, Amplified Attacks, and the Online Ecosystem
Broad monitoring and fact-checking outlets report a large-scale online campaign accusing Mamdani of being pro-Hamas or otherwise tied to extremists, including fabricated statements attributed to ISIS and millions of Islamophobic posts, with analyses concluding many claims are orchestrated disinformation rather than evidence-based accusations [4] [6]. Equality Labs and other observers documented millions of posts and a significant fraction accusing him of being pro-Hamas, and fact-checks in early November 2025 explicitly debunked specific fabricated attributions, underscoring that digital amplification has inflated and sometimes fabricated the apparent evidence linking Mamdani to extremist groups [6] [4].
5. Bottom Line: Evidence, Context, and Continuing Questions
Putting the pieces together: there is a verifiable 2017 lyric referencing individuals convicted for supporting Hamas, campaign donations from a controversial civil-society group reported in 2025, on-the-record statements in 2025 urging Hamas to disarm, and a large volume of debunked online smears; the combination yields credible grounds for scrutiny but not an incontrovertible finding of support for Hamas in the public record as of early November 2025 [1] [2] [3] [4]. The most responsible conclusion is that allegations include factual elements and disputed or unverified claims; discerning voters and investigators should weigh the dated artistic reference, the provenance of campaign funds, contemporaneous public statements, and the presence of deliberate misinformation when assessing whether Mamdani has expressed support for Hamas [1] [2] [3] [6].