How do cover image problems (size, bleed, fonts) cause KDP review rejections and how to fix them?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Cover technical faults — wrong dimensions, missing or mis-set bleed, and problematic fonts or spine text — are the most frequent reasons Amazon KDP will flag or reject a print-cover submission; industry guides and user reports repeatedly point to a required 0.125" (3.17 mm) bleed and precise full-wrap dimensions (trim + spine + bleed) as the common sticking points [1] [2]. Community threads and design help forums show authors often receive vague rejection notes (e.g., “add .125″ to top/bottom/sides”) and then struggle to match KDP’s template and export expectations, producing repeated failures until the cover file exactly matches KDP’s calculated template [3] [4].
1. Why KDP rejects covers: the technical rules that trip most authors
KDP’s print system expects a full-wrap cover that matches a calculated canvas: trim size + spine width determined by page count/paper type + bleed around all outer edges. Failing to match those exact pixel/inch dimensions or to include the required 0.125" (≈3.17 mm) bleed can trigger rejections or poor previews [5] [1] [2]. User reports and forum threads confirm that “incorrect dimensions” and bleed errors are the most common reasons for rejection and for confusing or repeated feedback from KDP reviewers [3] [6].
2. Bleed and safe-area problems: what they are and why they matter
Bleed is the design area beyond the trim edge so that backgrounds/graphics don’t show a white sliver after trimming; KDP expects roughly 0.125" on all four sides for paperback covers and for the full spread to include those bleeds in the document size itself rather than only as export settings [2] [4]. Sources advise building the canvas to the bleed-inclusive size (e.g., a 6×9 trim becomes 6.125×9.25 with bleed) and aligning background shapes to the bleed edges and sending those elements to the back layer so stray objects don’t break the bleed rule [2] [4].
3. Spine math and the frequent spine-text trap
Spine width is calculated from page count and paper stock; many templates and calculators exist to produce the exact full-spread width (back + spine + front). If spine text is present when a book is too thin (sources cite ~79 pages as a practical minimum for readable/allowed spine text), KDP may require its removal or will flag layout issues — authors who include small-spine text on thin books are often asked to omit it [7] [8]. Multiple guides recommend using KDP’s Cover Calculator or a template generator so your spine placement and size exactly match KDP’s formula [7] [8].
4. Fonts, embedded text and file-export pitfalls
While the provided sources focus more on bleed and sizing, they also emphasize clean layouts and proper export formats (JPEG/PDF/A) and warn that stray text boxes or non-sent elements can obscure bleed compliance; user posts advise flattening/exporting cover elements properly so that nothing (invisible layers or text frames) sits outside the expected canvas and trips automated checks [4] [8]. Available sources do not mention specific KDP font-subsetting rules beyond advising clean, flattened export files for compatibility and clarity [4].
5. Why KDP feedback sometimes feels vague — real reports from authors
Authors report receiving brief or repetitive instructions such as “add .125″ to the top, bottom and sides” yet still seeing rejections after doing so; community threads describe the frustration and the need to match KDP templates exactly [3] [6]. Adobe and design-community posts echo that KDP expects bleed incorporated into the document dimensions (not just as an export setting) and that stray elements or incorrect layer ordering can cause the previewer to flag the file even when measurements “look right” to the designer [4] [9].
6. Practical fixes — a checklist to stop rejections
- Use KDP’s Cover Calculator or an authoritative template generator to compute full-spread dimensions (trim + spine + bleed) and start your design on that canvas [7] [8].
- Always include 0.125" (≈3.17 mm) bleed on all outer edges and ensure backgrounds extend to that edge; align bleed shapes exactly and send them behind all other elements [2] [4].
- Calculate precise spine width from page count and paper type; omit spine text for very short books (rough rule: fewer than ~79 pages) [7] [8].
- Export on the correct settings (high-res JPEG or print-ready PDF with flattened layers) so invisible elements or layer-order issues don’t break the file [4] [8].
- If KDP’s reviewer message is short or unclear, re-download KDP’s template for your exact ISBN/parameters and compare pixel-for-pixel; community advice shows this often resolves repeated “add .125″” feedback [3] [7].
7. Conflicting advice and limits of reporting
Guides uniformly stress 0.125" bleed and template accuracy, but small variations in wording (0.125" vs 3.17 mm) and tool-specific guidance (InDesign bleed settings vs. file-size canvas) cause confusion; design-community posts highlight that KDP expects bleed to be part of the document size rather than only a setting [4] [9]. Available sources do not provide KDP’s internal error-code list or exact automated-check logic, so some uncertainty around why a specific file was rejected may remain unexplained by public reporting (not found in current reporting).
8. Bottom line — make KDP’s math your source of truth
Treat KDP’s Cover Calculator/template as the authoritative spec: build the canvas to its full-spread dimensions including 0.125" bleed, calculate spine from page count/paper, avoid tiny spine text, flatten/export correctly, and check layers so no stray objects break the bleed. Community and guide sources show that matching KDP’s computed template is the reliable path out of repetitive rejections [7] [2] [3].