What specific failed prophecies has Julie Green made and where were they published?
Executive summary
Julie Green has been publicly tied to several high-profile, now-unfulfilled political predictions—most notably that King Charles would not wear the crown, that specific prominent politicians would die within a given year, and conspiratorial claims about Joe Biden’s identity—and those predictions have been recorded and amplified both on her ministry’s media channels and across conservative and mainstream press that have documented their failure [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Failed prediction: "Prince Charles would never wear the crown"
Multiple commentators and forum threads identify a clear, falsified prediction attributed to Green that Charles would not ascend or wear the crown; the fact of Charles’s coronation is used by critics to mark that prophecy as failed, and that claim is cited directly in online commentary and discussion about Green’s record [1].
2. Failed predictions of specific political deaths and “Year of Death 2022” claims
Reporting ties Green to a string of prophecies forecasting deaths of high-profile “deep state” figures and other politicians in 2022—sometimes labeled the “Year of Death 2022”—including mentions of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi, which did not occur and have been singled out by journalists and analysts as unfulfilled forecasts [2] [5].
3. Failed conspiracy claim about Joe Biden and allegations of a body double
At least one mainstream outlet catalogs Green as having asserted that “the real Joe Biden is dead” and that a body double controlled by others is appearing in public, a claim that has been reported without corroboration and is cited by critics as an ungrounded, false prediction about a living president [3].
4. Where those prophecies were published or propagated
Julie Green’s own ministry maintains a media page where she posts prophecies and videos of her messages—this is the primary locus for her published words [4]. Beyond her channels, prophecies and their fallout have been amplified and critiqued on conservative and religious blogs, forums and podcasts (for example Crossing Swords, Christian Forums and The Lancaster Patriot) and examined by commentators and mainstream outlets such as Diana Butler Bass’s Substack and Rolling Stone, which have cataloged specific failed claims [5] [1] [6] [2] [3].
5. How critics document failure and the standards they apply
Critics apply both theological tests (citing Deuteronomy’s “one failed prophecy” standard raised in blog and forum posts) and journalistic verification—pointing to explicit, date-bound forecasts (for example predicted deaths or a coronation that would not occur) as straightforwardly falsifiable; these critiques appear in a range of venues from religious blogs to investigative pieces, which document the predictions and note their non-fulfillment [5] [6] [7].
6. Defenses, supporters, and alternative framings
Supporters of Green and some analysts argue prophecy functions as public moral speech or symbolic performance rather than literal forecasting, and some fans claim many of her prophecies have come true—an argument visible in supporter pushback on discussion threads and in defenses that urge discernment rather than outright rejection [6] [8]. Diana Butler Bass frames prophetic speech as less about literal accuracy and more about amplifying political hopes and grievances, suggesting some observers treat prophetic claims as political rhetoric with different evaluative criteria [2].
7. Limits of the record and open questions
Available reporting catalogs several high-profile failed predictions but does not provide an exhaustive ledger of every specific prophecy Green has made or a comprehensive timeline tying each prophecy text to a publication date; Green’s own media page hosts many items but does not substantively adjudicate contested forecasts, and thus definitive accounting beyond the well-documented examples cited here is limited by the public record [4].