How many genders according to bible
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Different Christian traditions and scholars disagree: many conservative and evangelical sources say the Bible recognizes two genders—male and female—often citing Genesis and church statements [1] [2]. Other scholars and progressive Christian voices argue the Bible’s language and examples (eunuchs, Hebrew categories, interpretive history) allow readings that recognize more than two or a spectrum of gender possibilities [3] [4].
1. What many conservative readers point to: a binary in Genesis
Conservative churches and writers interpret Genesis’ creation account as God making two distinct genders—male and female—and treat that as the biblical baseline for gender, arguing scripture contains no provision for additional human gender categories [1] [2]. Organizations and church position papers reiterate that gender should align with biological sex and that the Bible’s consistent witness supports a two-gender framework [5] [6].
2. How Christian scholarship complicates the “two” answer
Some biblical scholars and religious commentators note that a close reading of Hebrew and the wider biblical corpus yields more complex material: rabbinical sources have identified multiple gender-related categories in Hebrew, and the Bible includes figures (eunuchs, atypical gender expressions) and metaphors that resist a simple binary [3] [4]. These scholars argue scriptural texts invite debate about whether ancient categories map cleanly onto modern terms like “nonbinary” or “transgender” [3].
3. Denominational and institutional disagreement is real and public
Mainline and progressive Christian institutions often advocate inclusive readings that affirm nonbinary and transgender people, citing pastoral and theological reasons to broaden how scripture is applied today [7] [4]. In contrast, many evangelical and Reformed bodies maintain a strictly binary reading and advise pastoral care that encourages alignment of gender identity with biological sex [8] [5]. Pew polling and denominational documents show these differences translate into divergent policy and pastoral practices [9] [10].
4. Modern controversies illustrate the stakes
Recent campus disputes — where students cited the Bible to assert only two genders and faculty or institutions responded — show how biblical interpretation fuels immediate conflicts over grades, speech, and institutional policy [11] [12]. Media reporting highlights both campus discipline and community backlash as interpretive disagreements move from theological journals into public life [13] [14].
5. What the Bible explicitly says — and what it does not
Available sources show the Bible repeatedly names “male” and “female” and uses those categories in creation and teaching passages, which many take as explicit [1] [2]. Available sources also show the Bible does not use modern categories like “nonbinary” or “transgender,” and scholarship diverges on whether ancient terms map to contemporary identities [3] [15]. Sources do not claim the Bible offers a definitive count of genders using modern terminology — not found in current reporting.
6. Two interpretive approaches that shape conclusions
One approach treats biblical categories as fixed, universal truths about human nature—leading to a two-gender conclusion [2] [5]. The alternative reads biblical language contextually, emphasizing ambiguous or marginalized examples and arguing for interpretive flexibility that can encompass more than two genders [4] [3]. Each approach carries theological priorities: doctrinal continuity and social order versus pastoral inclusion and textual nuance [16] [7].
7. What readers should take away
If you ask “How many genders according to the Bible?” the answer depends on which Christian interpretive community you ask: many conservative sources answer “two” and base that on Genesis and subsequent theological interpretation [1] [2]; other scholars and progressive Christians say the biblical record and interpretive history permit readings that recognize more complex gender realities [3] [4]. Public controversies — like the recent university incidents — reflect this unresolved debate moving into civic life [11] [12].
Limitations and next steps: this summary synthesizes the supplied reporting and commentary; it does not adjudicate theological truth beyond those sources. If you want, I can compile key biblical passages and how each interpretive camp cites them (creation narratives, Deuteronomy 22:5, references to eunuchs, Paul’s letters) using only the sources you provided.