Has Israel anointed a high priest

Checked on September 21, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Was this fact-check helpful?

1. Summary of the results

The question of whether Israel has anointed a high priest is a complex one, with various sources providing different information. According to [1], Israel's reconvened Sanhedrin has nominated a High Priest, Rabbi Baruch Kahane, who declined the role but accepted a similar role with the title of 'Rosh Kohanim' (Head of the Priests) [1]. This indicates a significant step in preparation for the resumption of sacrifices on the Temple Mount. However, other sources, such as [2], [3], [3], and [4], do not mention the anointing of a high priest in Israel, instead discussing the historical role of the high priest, the preparation of Temple vessels, and the training of Levites for service in a rebuilt Temple [2] [3] [4]. [5] also discusses the nomination of a High Priest by the Sanhedrin and the potential implications for the rebuilding of the Temple and the restoration of the sacrificial system [5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key piece of missing context is the distinction between the historical role of the high priest and the potential modern-day appointment of a high priest in Israel. [6] notes that there has been no Jewish high priest since the destruction of the Second Temple [6], which highlights the significance of any potential modern-day appointment. Alternative viewpoints include the potential implications of appointing a high priest for the rebuilding of the Temple and the restoration of the sacrificial system, as discussed in [1] and [5] [1] [5]. Additionally, [1] provides context on the biblical era and the evolution of the high priest role over time, which may be relevant for understanding the significance of such an event [1].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement "Has Israel anointed a high priest" may be misleading, as it does not provide context on the historical role of the high priest or the potential modern-day appointment of a high priest in Israel. [1] and [5] suggest that Israel's reconvened Sanhedrin has taken steps towards appointing a high priest, but this information is not universally confirmed across all sources [1] [5]. The lack of clarity and consistency across sources may indicate a potential bias or misinformation in the original statement. Furthermore, the sources that discuss the nomination of a High Priest by the Sanhedrin, such as [1] and [5], may benefit from presenting this information as a significant step in preparing for the resumption of sacrifices on the Temple Mount, which could be seen as promoting a particular religious or political agenda [1] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the biblical requirements for a high priest in Israel?
Has the Temple in Jerusalem been rebuilt to accommodate a high priest?
What role does the Sanhedrin play in appointing a high priest in Israel?
How does the Israeli government view the anointing of a high priest?
What are the implications of anointing a high priest for Jewish eschatology?