What are some specific prophecies by Julie Green that faced criticism?
Executive summary
Julie Green — an Iowa-based self-described prophet — has issued a string of high-profile political and end-times prophecies that critics say have repeatedly failed to come true, including predictions about deaths of public figures, a promised “wealth transfer,” presidential legal and electoral outcomes, and sweeping judgments in future years; supporters dispute those criticisms and point to prophecies they say were fulfilled or remain pending [1] [2] [3] [4]. Major outlets and faith commentators have highlighted specific missed dates and public expectations tied to Green’s pronouncements, while conservative religious hosts and Green’s own channels push back and defend either her timing or the interpretive framework of prophecy [1] [5] [6].
1. “Year of Death 2022” and high‑profile victims — a prophecy that drew mainstream scrutiny
Green’s so-called “Year of Death 2022” — widely reported as predicting imminent deaths for “deep state” figures such as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton — became a focal point for mainstream criticism when those public figures lived through 2022, prompting articles and commentary questioning the reliability of her public prophetic timeline [1]. Diana Butler Bass and other commentators framed that pronouncement as emblematic of how Green’s words resonate politically with MAGA and QAnon-adjacent audiences but also invite scrutiny when outcomes don’t match asserted timetables [1].
2. Nancy Pelosi and other specific “will die” forecasts — critics catalog failures
Multiple critics and commentators have cataloged specific failed death prophecies attributed to Green, with one critical blog explicitly naming Nancy Pelosi as an example of a predicted death that did not occur within the implied timeframe, using that as evidence of false prophecy [2]. That blog went further to list additional political pronouncements it claims were inaccurate, positioning them as part of a pattern [2].
3. The “wealth transfer” of 2022 — a widely reported missed economic event
Green was publicly associated with a prophecy forecasting a major “wealth transfer” in 2022; critics say the event did not materialize in any demonstrable, singular way and cite that missed prediction when arguing she has a record of unfulfilled prophecies [2]. Opponents use the absence of a clear, verifiable wealth redistribution in 2022 as a test case under traditional criteria for judging prophetic validity [2].
4. Trump‑related forecasts — indictments, reinstatement, reelection and partisan fallout
Commentators critical of Green point to a string of Trump-related forecasts — including declarations that Trump would not be indicted, predictions of his reinstatement or guaranteed reelection — which critics say have been disproved by subsequent legal developments and electoral outcomes, and use those discrepancies to challenge Green’s prophetic credibility [2]. Supporters, however, reject those assessments as unfair or accuse detractors of selective sampling, arguing that some of Green’s words are being misrepresented or remain conditional [4].
5. Recent and future‑looking prophecies: 2025 reviews and 2026 warnings
Green’s public feed includes a December 2025 pronouncement warning of “more judgments against your enemies…coming in 2026,” language that has been cited by both supporters and critics as evidence she continues to make precise, time‑bound declarations that invite verification or refutation [3]. Prophecy reviewers in religious media have debated whether such statements are biblical revelation or political forecasting, with at least one show explicitly evaluating Green’s 2025 words alongside other prophetic figures and urging caution about methods and interpretation [5].
6. Defenders and detractors — competing readings of evidence and motive
Defenders accuse mainstream critics of bias and of misunderstanding prophetic genres, arguing some prophecies are conditional, symbolic, or not yet fulfilled; MarketFaith’s commenter base and Green supporters push back against what they call “hit pieces,” claiming inaccuracies in hostile reporting and insisting Green has valid fulfilled prophecies [4]. Detractors — ranging from faith commentators to conservative watchdogs and independent blogs — argue that repeated missed specifics disqualify modern claims to precise prophetic authority and warn of political harms when prophecies are weaponized in partisan movements [1] [2].
Limitations of reporting: available sources document which prophecies provoked criticism and note disagreements about fulfillment and method, but they do not provide a comprehensive, independently verified list showing every prophecy and its objective outcome, nor do they adjudicate disputed claims of fulfillment beyond the cited commentary [4] [1] [2] [3] [5] [6].