What specific events or prophecies made Julie Green known as a prophet?
Executive summary
Julie Green rose to public prominence by publishing frequent, dramatic prophetic messages via her Julie Green Ministries channels and by tying those prophecies to hot-button political events — including predictions about an “overthrow” or “reinstatement” of U.S. power, the death of public figures, and legal outcomes for Donald Trump — which mainstream outlets flagged as controversial or false [1] [2] [3]. Her ministry’s own archive documents daily prophecies and videos that she and supporters point to as the events or revelations that made her known as a “prophet” [4] [5].
1. The prophecy output: daily, publicized prophetic “words”
Julie Green publishes a steady stream of dated “words received” and video prophecies on her ministry site and Rumble channel; the ministry explicitly catalogs prophecies by date and points viewers to its media pages for the record [4]. The frequency and public archive of these pronouncements — from November 2025 entries calling out political “infiltrators” to earlier posted videos — are the basic public evidence supporters cite for her prophetic identity [6] [4].
2. High‑profile, political predictions that amplified her profile
Green gained wider notice because many of her most publicized prophecies targeted national politics and well‑known figures: she predicted a sweeping “overthrow” or “reinstatement” in the U.S., alleged the death of political figures such as Nancy Pelosi before 2022 midterms, and foretold favorable legal outcomes for Donald Trump — claims repeatedly highlighted by national outlets [2] [1] [3]. Those politically charged predictions helped move her from church circles into earned media coverage and social‑media virality [1].
3. Specific prophetic claims that drew mainstream reporting
Newsweek, Times of India and other outlets summarized several of Green’s dramatic claims: that an imminent “overthrow” or takeover of government would occur, that public figures would die or be removed, and that Trump would be found “innocent” in criminal proceedings — the latter prediction was later criticized when events did not match Green’s forecast and garnered follow‑up stories [1] [2] [3]. Rolling Stone and other reporting also called out an especially sensational prediction that Prince Charles would murder Queen Elizabeth, which became a focal point for skeptical coverage [7].
4. Supporters’ view: fulfilled or persuasive prophecies
Some followers and allied commentators argue Green has “numerous prophecies that have come to pass” and treat her dated archive and on‑camera delivery as evidence of prophetic gifting; her ministry and fans amplify later interviews and livestream appearances to bolster that claim [5] [4] [8]. Prophecy‑oriented directories and commentary cite her ministry biography and activity since the 2010s as background for her role as a public prophet [9].
5. Critics’ view: false or politically driven prophecy
Journalists and critics have cataloged missed or demonstrably false forecasts and framed Green as a “self‑styled” or “MAGA prophet” whose prophecies align with partisan hopes. Newsweek and Rolling Stone described a pattern of political prophecies that did not come true and noted how Green’s pronouncements were amplified within pro‑Trump and conservative spaces; critics tie her influence to political actors, such as events where she appeared alongside candidates [1] [3] [7]. MarketFaith’s coverage records both supportive comments and dissent within Christian readers about her accuracy [10].
6. How she presents herself and how followers verify claims
Julie Green Ministries warns about impersonators online and directs audiences to official channels; the ministry emphasizes not taking money for prophecy and maintains a dated index of prophecies so supporters can point to original texts and videos when arguing that certain prophecies were fulfilled [11] [4]. That archive functions as the primary evidence her network uses to establish her prophetic track record [4].
7. Why public attention grew: sensational content + social amplification
Green’s mix of sensational, specific predictions (deaths, coups, legal reversals) and frequent livestream/video distribution made her material highly shareable. Outlets and social commentators amplified particularly provocative forecasts — both to report them and to criticize them — which turned what might have been internal church messaging into national conversation [1] [2] [7].
8. Limitations in the available reporting
Available sources document many of Green’s public prophecies, the ministry’s archive, and critical coverage; they do not provide an exhaustive adjudication of every prophecy’s outcome or an independent theological assessment of her gift beyond observers’ praise or skepticism (not found in current reporting). The sources also do not offer internal documentation of how she discerns or validates prophetic accuracy beyond published words and videos (not found in current reporting).
Taken together, Julie Green became known as a “prophet” because she consistently framed herself as one, published a large, dated archive of prophetic words and videos, and issued high‑visibility, politically charged predictions that drew both enthusiastic believers and skeptical national media attention [4] [1] [7].