Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are there any documented cases where Julie Green's prophetic visions have come true or been proven false?
Executive Summary
Julie Green has a mix of specific, falsified, and highly ambiguous prophetic claims; several high-profile predictions have been demonstrably false while others are presented as “fulfilled” by sympathetic compilations but lack independent verification. Public documentation shows both explicit failed predictions—such as claims about Queen Elizabeth’s death cause and several 2022 political outcomes—and a set of vague forecasts that supporters interpret as fulfilled, producing a contested record shaped by partisan audiences and creator-curated compilations [1] [2] [3].
1. What Julie Green actually claimed — a concise inventory that matters to the truth hunt
Julie Green’s recorded prophecies include specific named events and people—claims that Prince Charles would murder Queen Elizabeth, that Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Mitch McConnell would be “taken out” by an angel, that President Biden would be removed or replaced, that Doug Mastriano would be elected and 2020’s results overturned, and predictions about geopolitical incidents (Antarctica, Turkey, Euphrates) plus media and corporate outcomes like “CNN going bankrupt.” These are concrete, checkable assertions when stated with names and outcomes; other entries on her ministry site are spiritual or metaphorical, which are inherently harder to verify [1] [3] [4].
2. Clear falsifications: predictions that have been disproven by basic facts
Several of Green’s named predictions have been clearly contradicted by public record. Queen Elizabeth II died of natural causes in 2022, not by murder attributed to Prince Charles, directly refuting that prophecy. Public figures named as being “taken out” in 2022 remained alive and in office through that year, and Doug Mastriano did not win Pennsylvania’s governorship in 2022, undermining claims that God had ordained that election outcome. These concrete, time-bound forecasts failed when compared to verifiable events, and independent reporting has cataloged those mismatches [1] [5].
3. The grey zone: alleged fulfillments and highly interpretable forecasts
Some items appear in compilations claiming fulfillment—episodes such as “Biden falling,” “a hot air balloon incident,” or events near the Euphrates—which supporters link retrospectively to Green’s words. These matches depend on broad, symbolic language and post hoc interpretation; vague imagery allows many real-world events to be read into earlier statements, so statistical or evidentiary standards for verification are weak. Compilations assembled by third parties or by Green’s ministry present curated pairings of prophecy and news item but do not supply rigorous contemporaneous timestamps or independent adjudication, making claims of fulfillment contestable [2] [6].
4. Who promotes these claims and why credibility varies across outlets
Green’s prophecies have been amplified by partisan allies—most notably Doug Mastriano in Pennsylvania—and by sympathetic ministry channels that compile “fulfilled” lists, which introduces potential political and organizational agendas. Conversely, watchdogs and critics from mainstream and progressive outlets have labeled Green a “false prophet” and highlighted specific failed predictions, framing her work within QAnon-style conspiracism and end-times politics. The divergent portrayals reflect clear partisan lenses: ministry channels emphasize prophecy-as-confirmation, while critics emphasize failed, testable predictions, and both use selective evidence to bolster narratives [1] [7] [5].
5. What the ministry lists and recent updates actually show—and what they don’t
Julie Green Ministries hosts sections titled “Prophecies” and “Prophecies Fulfilled” with dates up to 2025 claiming confirmations; however, these pages often lack contemporaneous documentation tying a published prophecy to a specific, time-stamped event that neutral observers can verify. Independent summaries from 2022–2024 document several failed predictions and note a pattern of vagueness or retroactive matching. The ministry’s internal claims of fulfillment therefore cannot substitute for independent verification, and current public records contain multiple proven falsehoods alongside disputed or ambiguous matches [3] [2].
6. Bottom line: what can be proven, what remains interpretive, and where to look next
Proven: a set of named, time-bound predictions attributed to Green were contradicted by public facts—these are falsified claims. Contestable: a number of her forecasts are vague and have been retroactively paired with events in curated compilations, which does not establish predictive accuracy. To judge any remaining prophecy, require three things: a contemporaneous, dated record of the exact wording; a narrowly described outcome; and independent third-party confirmation of timing and uniqueness—criteria absent in many of Green’s publicized “fulfillments.” For future verification, monitor primary posts with timestamps and independent reporting that either confirms or refutes those claims [1] [2] [6].