Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which of Julie Green’s visions have followers cited as accurately predicting events?
Executive summary
Available sources in this search set do not provide a compiled list of Julie Green “visions” that followers cite as accurately predicting events; reporting is limited to her own prophetic postings and a critical round-up arguing some of her predictions are unreliable (no independent verification found) [1] [2]. Julie Green’s own ministry posts prophecy content online (Rumble and jgminternational) while at least one critic on MarketFaith frames her among self‑styled prophets whose forecasts should be scrutinized under biblical standards [1] [2].
1. What the available primary material shows: Green posts prophetic claims publicly
Julie Green’s ministry publishes written “words received” and videos of prophecies on her site and Rumble channel; an example page on her site advertises a November 3, 2025 “word” and an accompanying video posted November 7, 2025 that addresses political “old guard” themes [1]. Her Rumble channel hosts a stream of prophetic videos and related material, indicating followers have public content to point to when claiming prior predictions were accurate [3] [1].
2. What critics say: theological and accuracy concerns
MarketFaith’s analysis categorizes Green alongside other self‑proclaimed prophets and argues that prophetic claims which fail should be rejected according to Deuteronomy 18; that piece explicitly urges skepticism about prognostications that do not come to pass and suggests some of Green’s style resembles “bizarre conspiracy” content that can mislead followers [2]. That source frames Green’s prophecies within a tradition of scrutiny toward modern prophets who make future predictions.
3. What followers claim (not documented here): available reporting is silent
Available sources do not include interviews, articles, or compiled lists showing which of Green’s visions followers have publicly cited as having predicted specific events accurately. MarketFaith records anecdotal perceptions (some comments praising her), but the set lacks independent corroboration or examples where followers point to dated predictions and match them to later real‑world outcomes [2]. In short: not found in current reporting [2].
4. Evidence gap: no independent verification in these sources
The materials provided are either primary content from Green’s ministry (prophecies posted) or critique of her role as a prophet; neither supply independent timelines, third‑party confirmations, or documented instances where neutral reporting has verified a forecast as accurate after the fact [1] [3] [2]. Therefore, claims about “which visions have followers cited as accurate” cannot be substantiated from these sources alone.
5. How followers could be expected to make such claims — and what to watch for
Given Green publishes time‑stamped words and video posts (e.g., the November 3/7, 2025 entry), followers who believe in her gifts can point to those timestamps when asserting a vision came true; the presence of a Rumble channel and ministry pages provides the raw material for such claims [1] [3]. But rigorous verification requires (a) locating the original dated prophecy, (b) identifying the later event followers say matched it, and (c) checking independent sources to confirm timing and specificity — steps not present in the current search set [1] [3] [2].
6. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas
Julie Green’s ministry content represents the pro‑prophecy perspective by construction: posting prophetic words and encouraging followers to interpret events through them [1] [3]. The MarketFaith piece reflects a watchdog theological stance that emphasizes scriptural tests for prophets and highlights risks of error or conspiracy framing; its agenda is evaluative and cautionary toward charismatic prophetic claims [2]. Readers should weigh Green’s self‑published claims against critical reviews and seek independent timelines before accepting assertions of accurate prediction.
7. Recommended next steps for a reader seeking verification
To answer your original question conclusively, locate specific dated prophecies on Julie Green’s official pages or Rumble channel (examples exist but are not exhaustively listed here), document the text and date, then identify the concrete event followers say was predicted and cross‑check independent reporting that establishes when that event occurred [1] [3]. The current sources do not perform that match‑and‑verify task for any specific vision [2].
Limitations: this analysis relies only on the three provided items — Green’s ministry posting, her Rumble channel listing, and a MarketFaith critique — and those sources do not document follower‑cited, independently verified predictions [1] [3] [2].