What organizations or followers promote Julie Green's prophetic claims?
Executive summary
Julie Green promotes her prophetic claims through an organized ministry that operates official channels across mainstream and fringe social platforms (Julie Green Ministries lists CloutHub, Facebook, Locals, Rumble, Telegram, TikTok, Truth Social, X and YouTube) and directly republishes prophecies on her site and Rumble channel [1] [2]. Critics and watchdog commentators also circulate negative takes and warnings about her prophecies on blogs and independent sites [3].
1. Julie Green Ministries: the institutional hub distributing the prophecies
Julie Green’s own ministry (Julie Green Ministries, abbreviated JGM) is the primary organization promoting her prophecies; the ministry hosts a “Prophecies” page and a media hub that republishes her messages, videos and written prophecies to followers [4] [1]. The ministry’s official media pages explicitly direct audiences to multiple platforms and a Rumble channel where video prophecies are posted, signaling an intentional cross-platform outreach strategy managed by JGM [1] [2].
2. Social platforms named by JGM — mainstream and alternative networks
JGM lists a mixture of mainstream and alternative social networks to distribute content: CloutHub, Facebook, Locals, Rumble, Telegram, TikTok, Truth Social, X (Twitter) and YouTube [1]. The Rumble posting for “Prophecies Fulfilled—Sports Industry Scandals” repeats direct links to the JGM Rumble channel, Telegram, Facebook, Twitter/X, Truth Social, Locals and TikTok, showing JGM’s deliberate use of those platforms to reach sympathetic audiences [2].
3. Affiliate and aggregator channels that amplify her messages
Third-party channels and prophecy aggregators also amplify Green’s output. The Rumble post and its description cross-promote an external “Prophecy Index” listing for Julie Green, and the post links to a separate Telegram channel called “PropheciesFulfilled,” indicating independent or semi-independent networks are republishing and indexing her material for wider dissemination [2].
4. Followers and the warning about impersonation and multiple accounts
JGM itself cautions that many accounts across platforms “claim to be Julie Green or Julie Green Ministries,” which suggests a network effect where followers, imitators, or impersonators can further spread or fragment her messaging [1]. That notice reflects both an attempt to consolidate official channels and an implicit acknowledgment that followers operate multiple unofficial accounts.
5. Critics and Christian commentators contesting her prophetic credibility
Independent critics and Christian bloggers publicly oppose Green’s prophetic claims. A critical blog post labels her a “false prophet,” accuses her of political motivation and of making failed death predictions (for example, an alleged claim that “Biden would die on the 17th May 23”), and warns churchgoers against following her [3]. That critique demonstrates organized rhetorical opposition outside of JGM’s own ecosystem.
6. The media-ecosystem picture: organized propagation plus contested reception
Taken together, the evidence shows an organized propagation model: JGM as the central promoter using official websites and accounts plus Rumble/Telegram/locals-style hubs and external prophecy-indexing sites to amplify content [4] [1] [2]. Simultaneously, independent critics and watchdogs publish counterclaims about accuracy and motives, creating a contested public record [3].
7. Limits of the available reporting and open questions
Available sources list the platforms and examples of third-party amplification but do not provide follower counts, the identities of key endorsing organizations beyond JGM, or financial backers; those specifics are not found in current reporting (not found in current reporting). Sources also do not document any formal alliances with larger religious networks or denominational endorsements (not found in current reporting).
8. What readers should take away
Fact: JGM operates multiple official channels and explicitly directs followers to mainstream and alternative platforms [1] [2]. Fact: outside critics label Green’s prophecies false and politically motivated, citing specific missed predictions [3]. Readers should weigh promotional reach (broad cross-platform presence) against disputes over credibility (independent critiques), and treat claims about large organized followings or institutional endorsements as unconfirmed until documented by sources beyond the ministry’s own listings (not found in current reporting).