How have pastors and mainstream denominations responded to invitations from TPUSA Faith?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Pastors have responded to invitations from TPUSA Faith in mixed ways: a cohort of evangelical and charismatic pastors has attended and spoken at TPUSA Faith summits while some mainstream denominations and other pastors have publicly distanced themselves or reacted ambivalently to the group’s politicized agenda [1] [2] [3]. Reporting shows acceptance from influential individual pastors alongside criticism from religious journalists and fractured institutional responses among larger denominations [4] [5] [6].
1. Invitations translated into packed summits and visible pastoral participation
TPUSA Faith has organized pastors’ summits and national events that drew hundreds of clergy and ministry leaders, with the organization covering costs like hotel rooms and positioning the gatherings as refreshers to “return to primary doctrine,” a pitch that succeeded in attracting speakers such as Greg Laurie and other high-profile pastors to its Faith Forward Pastors Summit [1] [4] [2].
2. Prominent pastors accepted and lent legitimacy
Well-known evangelical figures have accepted TPUSA Faith invitations and preached or keynote at its events, including Greg Laurie and other leaders whose participation has been promoted publicly and archived by ministers’ media, signaling that for some pastors the offer of platform and networking outweighed concerns about partisan optics [2] [4].
3. Some churches formally affiliated or promoted the partnership
By 2023, reporting shows that certain individual churches openly affiliated with TPUSA Faith on their websites and that TPUSA Faith framed this alignment as a mission to “activate the faith community” for civic engagement, indicating a level of institutional cooperation at the congregational — if not denominational — level [3] [7] [8].
4. Mainline and denominational responses were cautious, mixed, or patchwork
Mainstream denominations did not uniformly embrace TPUSA Faith; rather, institutional reactions have been uneven and sometimes cautious, with national bodies like the Southern Baptist Convention’s leadership issuing statements that praised aspects of conservative public witness while provoking controversy among rank-and-file pastors — illustrating that denominational leaders’ commentaries can both reflect sympathy and create intra-denominational pushback [6].
5. Critics saw politicization and an expressly partisan agenda in invitations
Religious journalists and critics attending and reporting on TPUSA Faith events characterized the organization’s rhetoric as explicitly political — urging a multi-year cultural “cleansing” or “exorcism” and promoting a MAGA-aligned doctrine for future generations — and flagged efforts to recruit pastors to preach political positions as a deliberate strategy to influence pulpits [5] [9] [3].
6. TPUSA Faith’s framing, incentives and outreach explain acceptance and resistance
TPUSA Faith frames its outreach as doctrinal renewal and anti-“woke” training for pastors while offering practical incentives — free lodging, national platforms, networks of ministry leaders — that have persuaded some pastors to participate even as critics argue the program advances a partisan cultural warfare agenda, creating a clear motive structure both for acceptance by clergy seeking resources and for resistance by those wary of politicizing ministry [8] [4] [7].
7. What remains unresolved and why the response is likely to stay fractured
Existing reporting documents pastors’ participation and denominational ambivalence but does not provide a comprehensive catalogue of formal endorsements or rejections from every major denomination, so while patterns of attraction and critique are clear, the full institutional map of support versus opposition to TPUSA Faith invitations remains incomplete in the public record cited here [1] [3].