Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Have there been any investigations into the allegations against Paula White?
Executive Summary
There is no evidence of an active criminal investigation into Paula White as of the latest reporting in 2025, but her past financial practices have drawn formal scrutiny and civil actions that have been reported across multiple outlets. Past probes by the Senate Finance Committee and civil lawsuits related to ministry finances and bank-account disputes are documented in sources from 2023 through 2025, while more recent coverage focuses on controversies and criticism rather than new investigative actions [1] [2].
1. Why reporters keep returning to White’s finances — a history that invited scrutiny
Reporting across 2023–2025 repeatedly highlights a pattern of financial controversy tied to Paula White’s ministries and personal ventures, including a cited Senate Finance Committee review of ministry finances covering 2007–2011. Coverage in early 2025 summarized that past committee scrutiny without identifying ongoing federal criminal probes, and it emphasized bankruptcy filings, fundraising practices, and criticism from ethics experts who called her fundraising model problematic [1] [3]. These accounts do not converge on a single criminal indictment or active investigative docket; rather, they document a trail of financial disputes and public ethics questions that have attracted congressional attention previously and prompted civil litigation by individuals claiming fiduciary or financial harms.
2. Civil suits and bank-account disputes that look like investigations but are different
Some reporting traces civil legal actions and lawsuits that involve allegations against White, notably a 2023 suit alleging unauthorized access to organizational bank accounts and claims that she profited improperly from others’ losses. These are framed in the journalism as private-party disputes and civil litigation rather than criminal investigations, meaning outcomes hinge on contract, fiduciary, or nonprofit-law remedies rather than criminal prosecution. Sources note Neal Schon’s lawsuit aiming to remove White’s name from band-related accounts as an example of a dispute pursued through the courts instead of through a law-enforcement-led inquiry [2]. The distinction matters because civil suits can result in monetary judgments or injunctions but do not necessarily trigger criminal charges or formal government investigations.
3. What the 2025 coverage adds — appointment and renewed scrutiny without new probes
Coverage of White’s 2025 appointment to a White House faith office renewed media attention and recapped prior inquiries—reporters reiterated the Senate panel’s earlier review and past bankruptcies—but the articles explicitly state they found no evidence of recent or active government investigations tied to those allegations. Journalists cited ethics critics and watchdogs who argue the documented patterns of donations and bankruptcy make her a controversial public actor, yet the reporting stops short of identifying contemporaneous investigative actions by federal prosecutors or new congressional subpoenas as of the spring 2025 reporting cycle [4] [3] [5].
4. Watchdog and observer perspectives — ethics concerns and calls for transparency
Non-governmental watchdogs and commentators emphasized systemic concerns: prosperity-gospel fundraising, nonprofit bankruptcy history, and perceived blending of ministry with personal enrichment. Reporting quoted ethics experts and watchdog organizations who label these behaviors problematic and who urged greater transparency, but those criticisms are framed as normative or reputational rather than evidence of undisclosed criminal investigations. MinistryWatch and ethics commentators circulated detailed histories of donations and organizational structures that informed public debate and media coverage, again reinforcing scrutiny without documenting any active law-enforcement probe reported in the compiled sources [5] [1].
5. Bottom line for readers: documented scrutiny, but no confirmed current investigation in these sources
The combined sources present a consistent narrative: there have been documented reviews, civil lawsuits, and a prior Senate Finance Committee examination related to Paula White’s financial activities, and those episodes have fueled public controversy and expert criticism. None of the provided 2023–2025 reports claim a current criminal or congressional investigation is underway as of their publication dates; rather, they recount historical probes, civil litigation, and renewed scrutiny tied to her public role. Readers seeking proof of an active investigation should look for formal filings—new subpoenas, indictments, or statements from prosecutors—which are not evidenced in these sources [1] [2].