Did any pope named Leo XIV exist in Catholic Church history?

Checked on January 4, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Yes — a pope who chose the regnal name Leo XIV exists in recent Catholic history: Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost was elected pope in May 2025 and took the name Leo XIV, becoming the 267th Bishop of Rome and the first U.S.-born pontiff, a fact reported across Vatican channels and major press outlets [1] [2] [3].

1. What the primary sources say: an unambiguous papal election

The Holy See lists “LEO XIV” among its official papal documents and public communications for 2025–2026, identifying him as the 267th pope, which is the most authoritative confirmation that a pontiff by that name occupies the See of Peter [1]. Contemporary Vatican reporting and Vatican News provide a biographical account of Cardinal Robert Prevost and his elevation to the papacy under the name Leo XIV, including his prior roles in the Roman Curia and the date of election, May 8, 2025 [4] [1].

2. Independent coverage and corroboration from major media

Every major English-language religious and general-interest outlet consulted — Britannica, NPR, ABC News, The Washington Post and National Catholic Reporter — reported the conclave result and identified Prevost as Pope Leo XIV, noting his Chicago origins, Augustinian background, and the historic nature of his election as the first American-born pope [2] [3] [5] [6] [7]. These independent reports align with Vatican sources and local diocesan statements about his first Mass and public addresses as pope [8] [9].

3. Why the name matters: continuity with prior Leos and symbolism

Commentators and historians immediately linked the new pontificate to Leo XIII — a 19th-century pope associated with modern Catholic social teaching — interpreting Prevost’s choice of “Leo XIV” as a deliberate invocation of that legacy, especially on labor, social justice and a middle course amid contemporary ideological divides; this interpretive frame appears repeatedly in reporting and features [10] [8] [11]. Background pieces on the papal name “Leo” trace a long lineage of influential popes named Leo, reinforcing that the numerical succession to XIV follows established papal naming conventions [12].

4. Where confusion or skepticism might arise

Some readers may be surprised because “Leo XIV” had not been seen in pre-2025 historical lists of popes; the numbering only makes sense once a pope adopts the name. Secondary sources such as Wikipedia and Simple English Wikipedia quickly created entries reflecting the election, but the primary confirmation is the Vatican’s official site and Vatican News [13] [14] [4]. Reporting does not suggest any credible dispute over the election’s validity; if one sought canonical challenges or dissenting accounts, the sources consulted do not document them [1] [3].

5. Balance and caveats: what the sources do and do not show

All cited materials consistently record that Cardinal Robert Prevost took the name Leo XIV and exercised papal ministry after his May 8, 2025 election; this is documented on the Vatican website and in contemporary news reportage [1] [2] [5]. The reporting offers interpretation about the name’s symbolism and potential policy implications but cannot definitively read the pope’s inner motives beyond his public explanation and the historical resonances cited by journalists and historians [10] [11]. There is no indication in these sources of competing claimants using the name or of errors in the official record.

6. Conclusion: direct answer

Yes — a pope named Leo XIV does exist in Catholic Church history as of 2025: Robert Francis Prevost was elected pope on May 8, 2025 and adopted the regnal name Leo XIV, an event recorded by the Vatican and widely reported by major news organizations [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the historical list of popes named Leo and how did each influence the Church?
How did the 2025 conclave that elected Pope Leo XIV unfold and who were the leading candidates?
What are the implications of Pope Leo XIV's choice of name for Catholic social teaching and Church diplomacy?