What public statements have other religious leaders made about Julie Green or Julie Green Ministries?

1. What the ministry itself says is public; outside voices are absent

Julie Green Ministries’ public materials include biographical notes and a doctrinal self-description—stating it is a nondenominational ministry that “believes the Word of God is the complete truth” and affirms Jesus Christ as “the Son of the One True Living God”—and these appear on the organization’s about page ^[1]. The ministry also posts prophetic messages urging followers to “keep your eyes on the Middle East” and warning of world-changing, unprecedented events and leadership removals framed as God’s action, content that the ministry itself presents as divinely revealed ^[2]. GuideStar’s profile likewise frames the organization’s mission as transforming lives through God’s unconditional love and the Word, reinforcing the ministry’s self-presentation rather than documenting external reaction ^[3]. None of these self-published pages contains quotations, endorsements, critiques, or public statements from other named religious leaders in the supplied sources ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.

2. Explicit warnings about impersonators—and why that matters to outside commentary

The ministry has posted an explicit notice warning that many social media accounts claim to be Julie Green or members of her team and reiterates that it “never conduct[s] ministry in exchange for money or make[s] promises tied to financial gain,” which suggests the organization is concerned about third-party representations and misinformation ^[4]. That kind of notice can both invite and deter public statements by outside religious leaders: it signals the ministry’s sensitivity to false affiliates while simultaneously complicating verification for any external commentator who might be asked to weigh in publicly on authenticity or conduct ^[4]. The presence of that warning in the provided sources is a factual detail about how the ministry manages public perception but does not substitute for external clergy commentary ^[4].

3. What the absence of external statements in these sources implies—and what cannot be concluded

Because the available reporting here is limited to the ministry’s own materials and a nonprofit profile, it is not possible from these documents to conclude whether other religious leaders privately support, criticize, or are indifferent to Julie Green or the ministry, nor to assess any controversies or public endorsements outside this self-published ecosystem ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. The lack of cited third-party statements in these sources might reflect that Julie Green Ministries is primarily communicating directly to its followers, that coverage from other clergy exists elsewhere but was not supplied, or that the ministry has not attracted notable public commentary from other faith leaders—each is a plausible reading, but none is provable from these pages alone ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.

4. How to verify whether religious leaders have spoken about Julie Green

To determine whether other religious leaders have made public statements, one must consult external reporting, social media threads from denominational bodies, statements from the head pastor of Faith Family Fellowship (where Julie served) or denominational press, press releases, or interviews outside the ministry’s own channels—sources not included in the supplied dossier ^[1]. The current sources do not cite interviews, press coverage, or letters from other clergy, so any definitive reporting on public statements by other religious leaders requires additional, independently published materials beyond what is provided here ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.

5. Bottom line and recommended next steps for a complete picture

Based strictly on the documents provided—Julie Green Ministries’ website pages on About, Prophecies, and general notices, plus its GuideStar profile—there are no public statements from other religious leaders included or referenced ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. For a balanced, evidence-based account of how peers in the faith community view Julie Green, reporters should seek independent media coverage, statements from denominational authorities or local pastors (including Faith Family Fellowship leadership beyond the ministry’s own claims), public social-media posts by named clergy, and any statements to registries or oversight bodies; those sources would either corroborate praise, criticism, or silence, none of which is documented in the supplied materials ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.