Which televangelists have directly criticized Joel Osteen and why?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Several public figures and Christian leaders have directly criticized Joel Osteen for preaching a “self-help” or “prosperity” version of Christianity, emphasizing upbeat, motivational messages over traditional doctrines like repentance and hell [1] [2]. Critics also point to his visible wealth and perceived reluctance to perform altar calls or open Lakewood Church in crises as focal points of reproach [3] [4] [5].
1. Who has publicly criticized Joel Osteen — names that appear in reporting
Reporting identifies conservative evangelical theologians and public commentators as Osteen’s most visible critics. Michael Horton, a Reformed theologian, was featured on 60 Minutes saying Osteen’s message amounted to heresy [1]. Broader reporting describes “evangelical Christians” and some pastors who accuse Osteen of being more motivational speaker than pastor [2] [6]. Outside the pulpit, country singer John Rich publicly attacked Osteen on a podcast, saying Osteen “is never going to say anything that’s going to make anybody uncomfortable” and complained he skips altar calls [4]. Major news surveys grouping televangelist controversies place Osteen alongside other figures criticized in the press [5].
2. What specific criticisms recur in the coverage
Three recurring critiques appear across sources. First, theological critics say Osteen “waters down” the gospel into a self-help message and avoids core topics such as hell and repentance [2] [6]. Second, critics label his preaching as the “prosperity gospel,” arguing it ties faith to material reward and celebratory wealth [3] [2]. Third, critics have targeted specific actions or omissions — notably allegations about not opening Lakewood during Hurricane Harvey and the perception he avoids altar calls — as evidence of pastoral failure [5] [4].
3. Examples and evidence reporters cite
60 Minutes ran a segment titled “Joel Osteen Answers His Critics,” in which Michael Horton told CBS that Osteen’s message is heresy — a direct theological denunciation noted in biographical summaries [1]. Country singer John Rich publicly said on a podcast that Osteen avoids uncomfortable preaching and does not offer altar calls, framing the issue as a moral and ministerial shortcoming [4]. Business and lifestyle reporting highlight Osteen’s wealth and lifestyle as fuel for criticism of prosperity teaching [3] [7].
4. How Osteen’s style and platform shape the debate
Osteen’s reach — millions of viewers globally and the large Lakewood congregation — magnifies every critique [3]. Sources describe his sermons as simple, upbeat messages that resonate widely while provoking accusations that they lack orthodox theological density; this stylistic choice is central to why theologians and some evangelicals single him out [2] [6]. Financial visibility and bestselling books intensify scrutiny of whether his ministry promotes material reward as a sign of divine favor [3].
5. Competing viewpoints and limits of the reporting
Sources explicitly record both sides: supporters view Osteen as an uplifting preacher whose positivity connects with millions, while critics call his approach motivational rather than doctrinal [2] [6]. The provided reporting documents direct criticisms by named individuals (Horton, John Rich) and broader groups (“some evangelical Christians”), but available sources do not provide a comprehensive list of every televangelist who has publicly denounced Osteen, nor do they give Osteen’s complete responses in each instance — that level of detail is not found in current reporting [1] [4] [2].
6. Why these disputes matter to religious audiences and the public
The debate around Osteen is a debate about what preaching should do: comfort and empowerment versus doctrinal correction and calls to repentance. When a pastor reaches millions, theological disagreements become public controversies about accountability, pastoral duty, and the influence of wealth in ministry — themes cited repeatedly in profiles and criticism of Osteen [3] [5] [6].
7. Bottom line for readers
Reporting shows concrete, named critics — notably Michael Horton and John Rich — and a pattern of criticisms focused on theology (watering down doctrine), practice (avoidance of altar calls; responses in crises), and finances (prosperity teaching and visible wealth) [1] [4] [3]. Available sources do not enumerate all televangelists who have criticized Osteen or detail every rebuttal he has offered; readers should consult primary interviews and Osteen’s statements for his full responses [1] [2].