What specific prophecies attributed to Julie Green can be independently verified and what were their outcomes?
Executive summary
Julie Green’s public prophecies are documented on her ministry’s website and in social media clips, and several high-profile predictions — notably threats of deaths among political figures and conspiratorial claims about President Biden — have been widely reported and critiqued in the press [1] [2] [3]. Independent verification is limited: mainstream coverage has identified specific dramatic claims and concluded many have failed or been misleading, but primary source lists of every prophecy and exhaustive outcome-tracking are not available in the provided reporting [4] [3].
1. What Green herself publishes and how specific those prophecies are
Julie Green Ministries publishes a catalogue of prophecies and videos on its website, which presents statements framed as divine words — for example proclamations that “Babylon has fallen” and other apocalyptic or political pronouncements — and notes that recent prophecies are posted and searchable on her media pages [1] [2]; those primary materials establish what she has publicly claimed but often present statements in sweeping, symbolic language rather than consistently itemized, timestamped predictions that make independent outcome-tracking straightforward [1] [2].
2. High-profile, specific claims reported by media outlets
Journalistic reporting has highlighted several specific and concrete-sounding claims attributed to Green: articles note a “Year of Death 2022” theme aimed at “deep state” figures, an assertion that the “real” Joe Biden was dead and replaced by a body double, and an on-air prophecy asserting Prince Charles would murder Queen Elizabeth — all of which were singled out by outlets such as Rolling Stone and commentary pieces summarizing media coverage [3] [4].
3. What can be independently verified from the provided reporting
From the reporting supplied, it can be independently verified that Green made or is attributed with those specific claims — the Rolling Stone story documents the Biden/body-double and Prince Charles assertions and notes her appearance in political events, and commentary by Diana Butler Bass and others compiles media responses labeling many of Green’s major political prophecies as incorrect or unfulfilled [3] [4]. The ministry’s own site also documents numerous recent prophecies and provides a public record of material to be evaluated [1] [2].
4. Outcomes and the limits of verification in the available sources
The sources supplied do not provide a complete, independent ledger matching each named prophecy to a verified outcome; instead they demonstrate that media critics and analysts have concluded many of Green’s most audacious political prophecies failed to materialize or were misleading [4]. Rolling Stone and related coverage present the claims and cast them as false or conspiratorial without a comprehensive, line-by-line outcomes list in the provided excerpts, and the ministry’s own archive does not itself adjudicate fulfillment [3] [1].
5. Assessment, alternative viewpoints, and reporting agendas
Observers quoted in commentary pieces frame Green’s prophecies two ways: critics argue they have been demonstrably wrong, politically motivated, or conspiratorial and therefore dangerous, while some supporters insist she has had fulfilled prophecies and point to selective successes or future fulfillment windows [4] [5]. Coverage from outlets like Rolling Stone focuses on sensational, verifiable claims and their political context [3], while Green’s own site and sympathetic prophecy-index entries present her ministry and claimed track record without independent adjudication [1] [5]; readers should therefore weigh the ministry’s primary claims against critical reporting and be aware that some outlets may emphasize failure to critique political influence, whereas sympathetic sources may downplay misses and emphasize faith-based interpretation [4] [5].