Which Christian denominations accept or reject Julie Green’s prophetic messages?

1. What Julie Green’s own materials say about denominational alignment

Julie Green Ministries defines itself as non‑denominational and rooted in charismatic prophetic practice, repeatedly framing its work as obedience to God’s Word and calling for discernment rather than alignment with any single historic denomination; the site highlights daily prophetic words, healing, and worldwide reach as evidence of support without naming formal denominational endorsements ^[1]. The ministry’s pages about prophecies and media likewise focus on controlling official accounts and reaching audiences across platforms, not on affiliation or formal recognition from mainline or evangelical denominations ^{[2] [3]}.

2. Who, according to these sources, accepts her messages — and why

Within the ministry’s own reporting, acceptance is described in terms of grassroots support: thousands of online viewers, international reach, and “wide support” among followers who respond positively to prophetic words and healing testimony, a pattern typical of independent charismatic streams that attract believers across denominational lines rather than institutional endorsements ^[1]. The language used — calling for Scripture as the measuring rod and urging discernment — is intended to reassure a broad evangelical and charismatic audience that the ministry roots itself in biblical authority even while operating outside denominational structures ^[1].

3. Explicit rejections or doubts in the available reporting

The ministry’s own About page acknowledges critics who question the “boldness of Julie Green’s political prophecies,” signaling internal controversy rather than an organized denominational rejection; the acknowledgement indicates that some observers — not identified as belonging to specific denominations in the source material — find those prophecies problematic ^[1]. The site does not publish statements from denominational authorities formally rejecting or accepting her prophetic claims, so there is no sourced record here of, for example, Roman Catholic, mainline Protestant, Eastern Orthodox, or evangelical denominational positions for or against her ministry ^[1].

4. What can be inferred — and what cannot be claimed from these sources

From the material provided it is reasonable to infer that Julie Green’s audience is primarily independent/charismatic and ecumenical in practice rather than institutionally affiliated, which explains broad supporter language and the absence of denominational endorsements ^[1]. However, the sources do not permit authoritative claims that any specific major Christian denomination has formally accepted or rejected her prophecies; making such claims would exceed what these documents report ^{[2] [3] [1]}.

5. Motivation, agenda and how that shapes acceptance or rejection

The ministry’s emphasis on controlling official social accounts and warning against impostor accounts points to a deliberate effort to centralize messaging and cultivate a unified supporter base, which can reinforce acceptance among followers and complicate external adjudication by denominations ^[3]. The site’s framing of political prophecies as “bold” and the admission of critics suggest an implicit agenda to influence political outlooks among followers while preemptively appealing to Scripture as validation — a dynamic likely to attract sympathetic charismatic networks and to raise concern among more cautious or institutional churches ^[1].

6. Bottom line for readers seeking denominational clarity

The available reporting from Julie Green Ministries indicates a non‑denominational, charismatic identity with strong grassroots acceptance and acknowledged critics over political prophecy, but it does not provide documented positions from established Christian denominations either accepting or rejecting her prophetic messages — that question remains unanswered by these sources and would require statements from denominational leaders or independent reporting to resolve ^{[2] [3] [1]}.