Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What specific NSA audit projects did Adam Zarnowski work on after his CIA experience?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the available analyses, there is no credible evidence that Adam Zarnowski worked on any specific NSA audit projects after his CIA experience. The sources reveal that Zarnowski made claims about being "personally involved in an NSA-authorized forensic audit of the 2024 election" [1] [2], but these appear to be unsubstantiated allegations rather than documented work history.
The analyses show that Zarnowski's actual documented work after his CIA experience focused on human trafficking investigations. He served as the Open-Source Intelligence and Trafficking Investigations Manager for the Anti-Human Trafficking Intelligence Initiative [3]. His verified professional activities centered on combating human trafficking rather than conducting NSA audits [4] [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question assumes that Zarnowski legitimately worked on NSA audit projects, but the analyses reveal significant credibility concerns about his claims. One source characterizes his narrative as "a work of fiction designed to shatter democratic discourse" and describes it as "live disinformation" [5]. Another analysis specifically raises "concerns about Zarnowski's credibility and the potential for disinformation" [5].
Key missing context includes:
- Zarnowski's claims about NSA election audits appear to be unverified allegations rather than established facts
- His documented professional work focused on anti-human trafficking efforts, not intelligence audits
- Multiple sources question the authenticity and credibility of his NSA-related claims [5]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question contains a fundamental factual assumption that may be incorrect. By asking about "specific NSA audit projects" that Zarnowski worked on, it presupposes that such work actually occurred. However, the analyses suggest this premise is highly questionable.
The question appears to treat Zarnowski's unsubstantiated claims about NSA election audits as established fact, when multiple sources indicate these are likely disinformation [5]. This framing could inadvertently legitimize false narratives about election audits and intelligence operations.
The analyses reveal that individuals promoting such narratives may benefit from undermining confidence in democratic institutions and election integrity [5]. The question's structure inadvertently supports this goal by treating disputed claims as verified information requiring only additional details.