Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: There is homosexuality in 99.9% of species in the world. Yet homophobia is in 1%. Which one is weird now?

Checked on May 20, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement's claim about homosexuality in "99.9% of species" is significantly inaccurate. Scientific evidence shows that same-sex sexual behavior has been documented in approximately 1,500 animal species [1] [1], which, while significant, is far from 99.9% of all species. The behavior is particularly common among primates and species with complex social structures [1].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual points are missing from the original statement:

  • Historical Documentation Bias: Until the 1990s, documentation of homosexual behavior in animals was limited due to observer bias and social attitudes. As of 1999, it had been documented in about 500 species [2].
  • Adaptive Functions: Same-sex behavior serves important social purposes in many species, including:
    • Social bonding
    • Conflict resolution
    • Strengthening group alliances [3] [3]

  • Distribution Pattern: The behavior is not randomly distributed across species but tends to be more prevalent in certain groups, particularly among primates [1]
  • Gender Distribution: Same-sex behavior is equally common among both male and female animals [3] [3]
  • 3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

    The statement contains several problematic elements:

    • The "99.9%" figure appears to be conflated with human genetic similarity statistics [4], which is an entirely different scientific concept.
    • The statement about homophobia being in "1%" of species is unsupported by any of the provided sources and appears to be making an inappropriate comparison between human social behavior and animal behavior.
    • The statement's rhetorical question ("Which one is weird now?") oversimplifies a complex scientific and social issue by attempting to draw direct comparisons between human social behaviors and animal behavioral patterns.

    The statement appears designed to support LGBTQ+ acceptance, which while a worthy goal, should be based on accurate scientific information rather than misrepresented statistics.

    Want to dive deeper?
    Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
    Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
    Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?