What specific scientific degrees does Dane Wigington list on his websites or social profiles?

1. What Wigington’s bios explicitly state: job titles and experience

Public biographies and guest pages call Wigington the lead researcher and administrator of GeoEngineeringWatch.org, the founder and producer of the documentary The Dimming, and an activist on climate engineering; they also note a background in solar energy, prior work at Bechtel Power Corporation, and licensure as a contractor in California and Arizona ^{[1] [3] [4]}.

2. What the sources do not show: named academic degrees

Across the provided profiles, interviews and third‑party writeups there is no listing of bachelor’s, master’s, PhD or other formal scientific degrees attributed to Wigington. Available sources do not mention specific university degrees or scientific credentials for him ^{[2] [1] [3]}.

3. How Wigington presents his expertise: researcher versus credentialed scientist

Wigington is repeatedly described and self‑presented as a “researcher” with nearly 30 years investigating geoengineering and climate intervention topics; those descriptors emphasize his investigative work and activism rather than formal academic training ^{[5] [6] [3]}.

4. Independent outlets’ framing and skepticism

Major outlets and analysts that mention Wigington frame him as a prominent figure in the chemtrail/geoengineering debate but contextualize his role as an activist and commentator rather than a representative of mainstream science; The Conversation piece, for example, treated his Cox/Carlson‑era exposure as part of a broader phenomenon and emphasizes how non‑falsifiable conspiratorial claims are received by the scientific community ^[7].

5. Media appearances and their implied authority

Wigington’s interview placements—Tucker Carlson’s program, Coast to Coast AM, and alternative media—boost public visibility and position him as an expert witness in public debates; those platforms often present him as having long experience on the subject, not as presenting formal doctoral or university credentials in the sciences ^{[6] [1] [8]}.

6. Claims about scientific tests and evidence on his platforms

Wigington’s work and allied outlets assert field tests and analyses (e.g., particulate tests claimed to show metals and graphene) and cite long‑term observation as the basis for his conclusions; the provided sources summarize those claims but do not include peer‑reviewed publications or university affiliation tied to formal degrees in the reporting shown here ^{[5] [9]}.

7. Why the distinction matters: expertise, credibility and public perception

Listing formal scientific degrees signals a specific kind of vetted expertise that matters in public debates. Wigington’s influence comes from investigative claims, documentary production and activist networks; media placements amplify those claims even as mainstream science outlets and fact‑checking organizations treat his assertions with skepticism ^{[7] [10]}.

8. Bottom line and research gaps

Direct answer: the available reporting and bios supplied by the search results do not list any specific scientific degrees for Dane Wigington; they do list professional experience (solar energy background, Bechtel employment, licensed contractor) and his role as founder/lead researcher of GeoEngineeringWatch.org ^{[1] [4]}. If you want a definitive list of Wigington’s academic credentials, further primary documentation (resume, university records, or a complete biography on his official site) would be necessary — available sources do not mention those records here ^{[2] [3]}.