Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which scientific experiments left on the Moon can still be observed or detected today?
Executive summary
Laser retroreflector arrays placed by Apollo, Soviet (Lunokhod) and more recent missions remain the clearest, actively used experiments on the lunar surface: they enable ongoing lunar laser ranging (LLR) that measures the Earth–Moon distance to millimetre–centimetre precision and “are still sending data” decades after deployment [1] [2]. Newer retroreflectors and optical ranging upgrades — including instruments deployed by Chang’e‑6, Chandrayaan‑3, Firefly’s Blue Ghost and other 2023–2025 efforts — have expanded coverage and daytime/infrared capabilities so LLR continues to be a live, global effort [3] [4] [5].
1. Why retroreflectors dominate the “still observable” list
Corner‑cube retroreflector arrays are passive, robust, and explicitly designed to be seen from Earth by timed laser pulses; Apollo 11’s array and follow‑ups on Apollo 14/15 plus Soviet Lunokhod reflectors were built to last and continue to produce return signals that ground observatories use for precise ranging [1] [2]. Because they require only pulsed laser light and sensitive detectors on Earth, retroreflectors avoid the lifetime limits of powered instruments and thus remain the primary lunar experiments that can reliably be “detected” today [1] [3].
2. What scientists actually measure and why it matters
LLR uses the round‑trip travel time of laser pulses to the Moon’s retroreflectors to determine Earth–Moon distance with millimetre–centimetre precision; these data refine lunar ephemerides, constrain models of lunar interior and tidal dynamics, and test general relativity — contributions explicitly credited to Apollo‑era reflectors and ongoing LLR campaigns [3] [2]. Recent LLR analyses have even been used to examine long‑term tidal friction and small changes in lunar recession rates over centuries, enabled by the long‑baseline dataset that retroreflectors provide [3].
3. Newer reflectors and improved observing techniques (2023–2025)
Since the Apollo-era deployments, multiple nations and commercial missions have placed additional retroreflectors: examples cited in recent reporting include India’s Chandrayaan‑3 Laser Retroreflector Array [6], China’s INRRI on Chang’e‑6 (far side, 2024), and Next Generation Lunar Retroreflector payloads on commercial landers such as Firefly’s Blue Ghost (operational by 2025) — all widening geographic coverage and enabling fresher LLR targets [4] [3] [5]. Observational advances such as daytime laser ranging using near‑infrared systems and higher repetition‑rate lasers have increased the frequency and precision of returns [3].
4. Other experiments on the Moon that are or could be detected
Some powered experiments (seismometers, GNSS/LuGRE receivers, technology demonstrations) have recorded data for months-to-years after landing and can be monitored while they operate — for example, NASA selected a Farside Seismic Suite for delivery to Schrödinger basin to record months of seismic data beyond lander lifetime, and Blue Ghost carried experiments like LuGRE and RadPC which reported activity in 2025 [7] [5]. However, unlike passive retroreflectors, these instruments depend on mission‑specific power/telemetry; their detectability now depends on whether the lander/rover still operates and whether teams are still receiving data [7] [5].
5. Limitations and gaps in available reporting
Available sources emphasize retroreflectors and recent 2023–2025 deployments and upgrades [1] [3] [4], but they do not provide a comprehensive, itemized inventory of all surviving surface experiments or real‑time operational status for each powered instrument (available sources do not mention a full catalog of current operational non‑retroreflector experiments). Sources also report improved instrumentation and daytime ranging but do not quantify precisely which reflector sites are actively used each month or which older powered experiments (if any) still transmit telemetry today [3] [5].
6. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas to note
Scientific teams promoting new retroreflector deployments and upgraded LLR capability emphasize long‑term fundamental science gains (precision geodesy, gravitational tests) and the practical benefit of broader geographic coverage [3]. Commercial and agency press releases about CLPS deliveries and Blue Ghost frame these payloads as demonstrations that advance future human missions and technology readiness [5] [7]. These announcements have an implicit agenda to justify funding and commercial partnerships; independent verification of long‑term operation for powered payloads is sparsely documented in the provided sources [5] [7].
7. Bottom line for a curious reader
If you ask “which lunar experiments can still be observed today?” the strongest, best‑documented answer is the family of retroreflector arrays — Apollo, Lunokhod and more recent retroreflectors — which continue to yield measurable laser returns and underpin active LLR science [1] [2] [3]. Other surface experiments have finite lifetimes or intermittent telemetry; recent CLPS and commercial missions broadened the set of detectable targets but the long‑term operational status of many non‑passive instruments is not fully enumerated in the available reporting (p1_s5; [7]; available sources do not mention an exhaustive list).