What are the main lines of evidence that Earth's climate is warming?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Human-driven warming is supported by multiple, independent lines of evidence: rising global surface and ocean temperatures, increasing atmospheric CO2 tied to fossil fuels, melting ice and rising seas, and attribution studies showing natural factors cannot explain the observed trend [1] [2] [3]. These observations are reinforced by paleoclimate records and climate models that together make the case that recent warming is both real and primarily caused by human greenhouse‑gas emissions [4] [5].
1. Surface and ocean temperature records show a clear long‑term warming trend
Instrumental records compiled from land stations, ships, buoys and satellites indicate that global average surface temperature has risen by about 1°C since 1900, with each of the last four decades warmer than any prior decade in the instrumental record [1]. Oceans, which absorb most excess heat, have warmed measurably as well—ocean temperature datasets and satellite observations provide consistent evidence that global heat content has climbed over recent decades [6] [7].
2. The atmosphere’s greenhouse‑gas burden has risen in step with fossil fuel use
Direct atmospheric measurements—including the long Keeling record—show CO2 and other greenhouse gases have increased dramatically since the Industrial Revolution, and carbon isotope and emissions inventories link that rise to fossil‑fuel burning and land‑use changes [2] [7]. Multiple organizations summarize that CO2 is the main driver of recent warming and that human emissions are responsible for roughly 1.1°C of warming since 1850–1900 [3] [8].
3. Cryosphere retreat and sea‑level rise are tangible consequences of warming
Glaciers worldwide, Arctic sea ice, and portions of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have shown net mass loss, and global average sea level has risen—partly from thermal expansion of warming oceans and partly from meltwater—by roughly a few tens of centimeters since the early 20th century according to multiple assessments [1] [9]. These changes match the expected physical response to a warmer world and are documented across independent observational networks [10].
4. Biological and ecological signals corroborate physical measurements
Changes in the timing of bird migrations, shifts in species’ ranges, earlier springs and longer frost‑free seasons are observed across ecosystems and align with warming trends detected in instrumental records and proxy reconstructions [2] [9]. Such biological “fingerprints” provide independent, real‑world confirmation that climate conditions have shifted in ways consistent with rising temperatures [5].
5. Paleoclimate data place modern warming in historical context
Ice cores, tree rings, corals and marine sediments extend the climate record back centuries to hundreds of thousands of years and show that current rates and magnitudes of warming are unusual in the context of the Holocene; these proxies also reveal the close historical coupling of CO2 and temperature over glacial‑interglacial cycles [4] [11]. Scientists use these longer records to test and validate the mechanisms inferred from modern observations and models [12].
6. Attribution studies and climate models isolate human influence
When models include only natural forcings—solar variability, volcanic aerosols, orbital changes—they cannot reproduce the observed warming of the last half‑century; adding observed greenhouse‑gas increases reproduces the trend, and formal attribution studies conclude human activities are the dominant cause of recent warming [1] [13]. The IPCC and national science academies synthesize these multiple strands and conclude that anthropogenic greenhouse‑gas emissions are the principal driver [3] [14].
7. Where uncertainty and disagreement remain, and why that matters
Uncertainty exists in the pace of future warming, regional changes, cloud and aerosol feedbacks, and exact magnitudes of some cryosphere responses, which is reflected in model spread and caveats in assessments; however, these uncertainties do not undermine the core conclusion that Earth is warming and that humans are the main cause [1] [5]. Some public debate emphasizes short‑term variability (for example decadal oscillations) or selective datasets—useful for nuance but inadequate to overturn the broad, multi‑decadal, multi‑proxy evidence synthesized by agencies such as NASA, NOAA, the IPCC and national academies [15] [8].