Fact check: Are there any scientific studies supporting IQ Blast Pro's effectiveness?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, there are no scientific studies supporting IQ Blast Pro's effectiveness. The evidence reveals a concerning pattern of deceptive marketing practices surrounding this product.

The analyses show that IQ Blast Pro appears to be promoted through fraudulent means, including fake celebrity endorsements and deepfake videos ^[1]. One source specifically exposes the product as a scam, highlighting the use of false claims of FDA approval and fabricated endorsements from notable figures like Dr. Sanjay Gupta and Bruce Willis ^[1].

While one source provides a review discussing the product's ingredients, benefits, and potential side effects, it notably fails to cite any scientific studies supporting the product's claimed effectiveness ^[2]. This absence of scientific backing is particularly significant given that legitimate cognitive enhancement products typically reference peer-reviewed research.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question assumes IQ Blast Pro is a legitimate product worthy of scientific investigation, but the analyses reveal important missing context:

• Fraudulent marketing practices: The product is promoted using deepfake technology and fake celebrity endorsements, which are illegal marketing tactics ^[1]
• Regulatory deception: False claims of FDA approval suggest the marketers are deliberately misleading consumers about official regulatory backing ^[1]
• Pattern of supplement industry exploitation: This appears to be part of a broader trend where unscrupulous companies exploit consumers' desire for cognitive enhancement

Alternative viewpoint: Supplement manufacturers and affiliate marketers would benefit financially from promoting belief in IQ Blast Pro's effectiveness, even without scientific evidence. These parties profit from consumer purchases regardless of actual product efficacy.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains an implicit bias by assuming IQ Blast Pro is a legitimate product that might have scientific backing. This framing:

• Legitimizes a fraudulent product by treating it as worthy of scientific consideration
• Ignores red flags that should immediately raise suspicion about the product's legitimacy
• Fails to acknowledge the documented use of illegal marketing practices, including deepfake videos and fake celebrity endorsements ^[1]

The question would be more appropriately framed as: "Is IQ Blast Pro a legitimate product, or is it a scam?" given the evidence of fraudulent marketing practices revealed in the analyses.