Is man made climate change a hoax?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
No — the claim that man-made climate change is a hoax is not supported by the peer‑reviewed scientific record: multiple large literature reviews and major scientific bodies report overwhelming agreement that recent global warming is real and driven primarily by human greenhouse‑gas emissions [1] [2] [3]. Dissenting papers and critiques of how consensus is quantified exist and are part of scientific and public debate, but they do not overturn the broad conclusion reached by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and leading science institutions [4] [5].
1. The state of the evidence: overwhelming scientific agreement
Analyses of the peer‑reviewed literature and surveys of active researchers find a very strong consensus that Earth’s surface temperatures have risen in recent decades and that human activities — chiefly emissions of greenhouse gases — are the dominant cause; landmark syntheses report figures commonly cited around 97% or higher of published papers and experts endorsing anthropogenic warming [1] [6] [7]. Recent meta‑analyses and literature counts have pushed that agreement estimate into the high‑90s and, in some reviews of specific datasets, even above 99% of surveyed papers, reinforcing the message that the core finding is robust across methods [8] [9] [10].
2. Institutional endorsement: what major science organizations say
National and international science academies, NASA, NOAA and other authoritative bodies explicitly conclude that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land and that continued emissions will increase harmful impacts unless curtailed — positions reflected in IPCC assessment reports that synthesize thousands of studies [2] [3] [5]. These institutional statements matter because they rest not on single studies but on cumulative evidence and repeated independent observations of temperature trends, atmospheric composition, and attribution studies linking emissions to observed changes [2] [3].
3. Where the “hoax” claim comes from and why it persists
Claims that climate change is a hoax often exploit public confusion about numbers, methodological nuance, or minority dissent; some organizations with ties to extractive industries have a history of promoting doubt about the consensus, and media coverage can amplify outlier views to manufacture controversy [1] [5]. Academic critiques also exist over how the consensus percentage is calculated — for example, analyses that widen the surveyed population to include non‑climate specialists report lower agreement rates — which critics use to argue that consensus claims are overstated, even while acknowledging broad agreement among active climate researchers [4].
4. What scientific disagreement actually looks like
Where scientists debate is not over whether humans have warmed the planet but over the magnitude, timing, regional impacts, climate sensitivity (how much warming per CO2 doubling), and the detailed chain of feedbacks and extremes; these technical uncertainties shape predictions and policy choices but do not negate the basic causal link between greenhouse‑gas emissions and warming [5] [3]. Peer‑reviewed work continues to refine attribution of specific extreme events and to narrow ranges of future projections, which is how robust science advances rather than by overturning foundational conclusions [3].
5. Reading the landscape: evidence, politics and what follows
The empirical and institutional record compiled by scientific organizations and literature surveys makes the “hoax” label inaccurate as a statement about scientific knowledge; nevertheless, policy debates remain political and influenced by economic interests and communication failures, which help explain persistent public skepticism despite scientific consensus [1] [11]. Responsible reporting and public discussion require distinguishing legitimate scientific uncertainty about details from wholesale rejection of the core evidence that human activity is the primary driver of recent climate change [5] [11].