What peer-reviewed papers has Neurocept published and in which journals?

1. What the sources actually show: commercial coverage, not peer‑review

All direct hits for “Neurocept” in the supplied results point to marketing, press releases, consumer reviews and newswire items positioning Neurocept as a brain‑health supplement or product launch; examples include a GlobeNewswire press release republished by Yahoo Finance and The Manila Times and multiple consumer‑focused reviews ^{[1] [2] [3] [7]}. Those entries are promotional or editorial consumer coverage and are not peer‑reviewed scientific papers ^{[1] [2] [7]}.

2. What the scientific/journal sources in the results represent

The search results also list major peer‑review journals and publishers in neuroscience (examples: Neuroscience on ScienceDirect, Neuroscience Research, The Lancet Neurology, Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroReport) — each is a bona fide peer‑review venue that publishes neuroscience research ^{[4] [5] [6] [8] [9]}. However, those results are general pages for the journals and do not document any article authored by “Neurocept” ^{[4] [5] [6]}.

3. Absence of evidence in the provided material

The supplied search results do not list any peer‑reviewed studies, author names, DOIs, or journal citations tying Neurocept to published research. Therefore, available sources do not mention any peer‑reviewed papers published by Neurocept or identify journals that have published work under that name ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}.

4. Possible reasons for the gap — competing interpretations

There are two plausible explanations consistent with the material. First, Neurocept may be solely a commercial supplement brand that markets itself with press releases and consumer coverage rather than peer‑reviewed studies; the press and review pieces emphasize market positioning and ingredient transparency rather than citations to academic papers ^{[1] [7]}. Second, Neurocept might sponsor or reference research that exists but was not captured in the supplied search results; the current reporting simply does not include such studies. The sources do not confirm either explanation definitively ^{[1] [2]}.

5. How to verify peer‑review claims beyond these results

To establish whether Neurocept has peer‑reviewed publications, consult indexed databases and journal sites directly: PubMed/PMC, Web of Science/Scopus, CrossRef/DOI search, or the archives of the journals named in the results (Neuroscience, Neuroscience Research, Journal of Neuroscience, Lancet Neurology, etc.). The provided sources include links to those journals’ home pages but no article‑level evidence of Neurocept authorship ^{[4] [5] [8] [6]}.

6. Caveats, source limitations and potential agendas

This analysis is limited to the supplied search results. The materials heavily feature promotional coverage (newswire, affiliate reviews) — content that has clear commercial agendas and may overstate scientific backing; multiple entries are republished press releases or affiliate review pages that seek sales or attention ^{[1] [7] [10]}. Major journal pages in the results are authoritative but only as journal homepages; they do not corroborate Neurocept’s publication record in the dataset provided ^{[4] [5]}.

7. Bottom line and recommended next steps

Based on the available sources, there are no peer‑reviewed papers by “Neurocept” identified in the supplied results ^{[1] [2] [3]}. For a definitive answer, search PubMed/PMC and the major journal databases directly for “Neurocept” as an author, sponsor, or in acknowledgments, and request any claimed DOI or citation from Neurocept’s manufacturer; available sources do not mention such citations ^{[4] [5] [1]}.