Have robotic missions imaged Apollo landing sites and their planted flags?

Checked on December 13, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Robotic imagery from NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has photographed all six Apollo landing sites and shows shadows interpreted as flagpoles at Apollo 12, 16 and 17 while Apollo 11’s flagpole is not visible and is believed to have been knocked over during liftoff, per NASA and LROC reporting [1] [2] [3]. Multiple news outlets and NASA history pages report that the flags likely survived physically but are probably bleached or degraded by decades of ultraviolet exposure [4] [5].

1. What the robots actually imaged

High-resolution LRO Narrow Angle Camera photos reveal the descent stages, rover tracks, astronaut bootprints and, in many cases, the flag shadows at Apollo landing sites [6] [1]. LROC team commentary and NASA visualizations identify flag shadows at Apollo 12, Apollo 16 and Apollo 17; LROC states the images make it “certain” those flags are still standing and casting shadows, with the notable exception of Apollo 11 [3] [1].

2. Why flags show up as shadows, not full-color cloth

LROC’s images are taken from orbit at resolutions measured in tens of centimeters per pixel and at solar angles that make thin vertical objects easier to detect via their shadows. The teams emphasize what is visible is the pole/shadow signature, not a detailed, colored textile; NASA and independent coverage point to shadow features as the primary evidence for remaining flagpoles [6] [3].

3. The Apollo 11 exception: contemporary accounts and imagery

NASA’s historical record and mission accounts note Buzz Aldrin reported he saw the Apollo 11 flag fall over during Eagle’s ascent, and LRO imagery has failed to show a standing pole at Tranquility Base — consistent across NASA history pages and LROC/NASA summaries [2] [1]. BBC and other reporting also note Apollo 11 is the lone site without a clear flag shadow in LRO images [7].

4. Condition of the flags: standing does not mean unchanged

Sources consistently warn that even where flagpoles appear to remain upright, the fabric almost certainly has been degraded by unfiltered solar ultraviolet and extreme thermal cycling; several outlets state the flags are likely bleached to white and may be disintegrating even while still on their poles [5] [4]. LROC authors express surprise that flag assemblies survived but concede the textile’s appearance and color are unknown from orbital images alone [3].

5. How definitive is the orbital evidence?

LRO imagery is convincing about hardware footprints and pole-like shadows but cannot show fabric detail; NASA’s visualization work combines NAC photos and elevation models to locate small objects and shadows but the interpretation relies on geometry and context rather than a direct close-up of cloth [6] [3]. Available sources do not mention any robotic lander or rover that has directly inspected the original Apollo flags at close range.

6. Alternative viewpoints and skepticism

Conspiracy-minded narratives often seize on the flags’ “waving” images from 1969, but museum and science explainers note the flags were fitted with a horizontal telescoping rod to appear extended and the wrinkles are mechanical, not wind-driven — mainstream sources treat that as resolved [8]. Mainstream journalists and NASA sources uniformly treat LRO shadow detections as robust evidence for standing poles at most sites, while noting assumptions about fabric color and integrity remain.

7. What this matters for public understanding

The LRO photographs provide independent robotic confirmation that human-made artifacts remain where left — a key empirical rebuttal to any claim Apollo visits didn’t occur — but they also show the limits of orbital proof: presence of a pole or shadow is not the same as photographic proof of intact, colored cloth [1] [6]. Journalistic coverage balances those two facts: standing hardware is evident; textile condition and color are not.

Limitations: reporting and NASA pages cited here are based on orbital remote sensing and historical mission logs; none of the provided sources report a robotic close-up inspection of the original flag cloth itself, and available sources do not mention any definitive color photographs of the flags taken from orbit [3] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
Which robotic probes have photographed Apollo landing sites and what did they show?
Did orbital images capture the Apollo-era flags or only descent stages and footpaths?
How do modern lunar missions verify the locations of Apollo artifacts?
Have any landers or rovers visited Apollo sites to take close-up photos of equipment?
What controversy or conspiracy claims persist about images of the Apollo landing sites?