What scientific evidence rules out the world ending on December 25, 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Scientific monitoring and mainstream analysis provide no evidence that the world will end on December 25, 2025; notable scientific institutions have not identified any imminent planetary-scale threat for that date [1] and widely circulated prophetic claims rest on centuries‑old texts, modern misattributions, or unverifiable psychic testimony rather than empirical data [2] [3] [4].
1. What the claims say and where they come from
Recent doomsday chatter points to religious prophecies and reinterpretations of Nostradamus and other seers that allege an incoming comet or cosmic catastrophe slated for late 2025, with one contemporary story tracing back to Gohar Shahi’s book and viral Nostradamus translations circulating online [2] [3]; psychic predictions and tabloid coverage amplify these narratives despite their provenance in religious text, poetic quatrains, or second‑hand recollections [4] [5].
2. What mainstream scientific authorities report
Mainstream scientific institutions have not corroborated any claim of an extinction‑level impact in December 2025; explicit reporting in established outlets notes that NASA has not identified any asteroids or comets on a collision course with Earth for 2025, and those assessments are cited directly in contemporary coverage challenging viral predictions [1].
3. The astronomical observations mentioned in coverage
Some articles cite real astronomical objects—most prominently the interstellar visitor 3I/ATLAS—but even that object was projected to remain tens of millions of miles from Earth at its closest approach in December 2025 and was not reported as a collision threat in the pieces reviewed [2]; such reporting shows how legitimate space‑objects can be misframed into doomsday narratives without new supporting data.
4. Why symbolic measures and historical predictions fuel anxiety
Symbolic measures like the Doomsday Clock capture public concern about existential risks but do not predict a calendar date for planetary destruction; the Bulletin’s clock is intended to spur debate on issues such as nuclear risk and climate, and its movement closer to midnight in 2025 reflects broad risk assessment rather than a forecast of a specific day ending the world [6]. Historical lists of apocalyptic dates demonstrate that end‑time predictions are recurrent and often rooted in cultural or religious interpretation rather than repeatable scientific methodology [7].
5. The limits of the available reporting and competing narratives
The reviewed sources document the existence of prophecies, psychics’ forecasts, and symbolic warnings, and they also report that scientific agencies have found no impact threat for 2025 [2] [3] [1] [4] [6], but the material does not include a formal single‑sentence denial from a global scientific body explicitly stating “the world will not end on December 25, 2025”; instead the rebuttal is implicit in NASA’s non‑detection reports and in mainstream science commentary that frames such predictions as unsubstantiated [1] [7].
6. Reading the signals: what counts as scientific evidence against an imminent apocalypse
In practice, the strongest scientific evidence that a specific end‑of‑world date is unfounded appears in systematic sky surveys and catalogues of near‑Earth objects and in expert risk assessments that find no collision course for 2025, and contemporary journalism cites those data points when debunking viral predictions [1] [2]. Alternative viewpoints persist—some religious and psychic sources continue to assert impending doom—and those serve social or ideological functions such as community cohesion, media attention, or follower mobilization, which tabloid and fringe outlets often amplify for clicks or influence [2] [4].