What exactly is the 'Strain pandemic simulation' referenced in Epstein‑era emails and who authored it?

Checked on February 7, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The phrase “Strain pandemic simulation” appears in the newly released trove of Jeffrey Epstein‑era documents as reported by some outlets, and at least one outlet attributes authorship or specification of that simulation to Bill Gates; however the public record in the DOJ release is imprecise, heavily redacted, and mainstream reporting has not confirmed the detailed technical claim [1] [2] [3]. The documents are a vast, messy corpus that has already produced rampant speculation and conflicting narratives, so any definitive claim about who “authored” a particular simulation is not supported by the full set of vetted sources provided here [4] [5].

1. What the public documents actually contain about a “Strain pandemic simulation”

The Department of Justice produced millions of pages of material tied to Jeffrey Epstein and related investigations in response to the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and those pages include email correspondence, notes and attachments that mention a range of health‑related projects and proposals; that larger context is undisputed in the DOJ announcement and mainstream reporting [2] [5]. Within that corpus some documents, as highlighted by at least one outlet, reference a deliverable described as a “Strain pandemic simulation” or specifications for a simulation project, but the citation to those specific phrases comes primarily from one reporting source among those provided [1].

2. Who the reporting names as the author or instigator

A single source in the dataset of coverage included here—RT—states that emails show Bill Gates outlining deliverables and specs for a “Strain Pandemic Simulation” in 2017 and characterizes those documents as Gates‑authored or directed with Epstein involvement [1]. Other outlets in the provided set, including major mainstream outlets that covered the wider file release, document numerous health and science conversations appearing in Epstein’s inbox and note Bill Gates and many Silicon Valley figures appear in the trove, but they do not independently corroborate the RT claim that Gates authored or formally commissioned that particular simulation specification [3] [6].

3. Assessing the strength of attribution in the files

The released material is enormous and inconsistently redacted, and reporters have repeatedly cautioned that drafts, forwarded notes, and Epstein‑saved documents can obscure authorship—files may be drafts saved in Epstein’s account rather than provenance of their composition—so simple presence in the inbox does not prove who wrote a given phrase or who commissioned work [6] [2]. Independent outlets cited here report that many entries in the files are ambiguous about authorship and context, and other analysis has warned that the trove has fueled conspiratorial leaps because of those ambiguities [6] [4].

4. Why the claim spread and what agendas are visible

The novel claim linking Gates to a pre‑COVID “Strain pandemic simulation” has proven highly shareable because it overlaps with existing public debates about Gates and pandemic preparedness; fringe and state‑backed outlets alike have amplified it in ways that can conflate a mention in an email with operational authorship or sinister intent [1] [4]. Mainstream coverage of the files has focused on the credibility problems created by redactions, privacy harms to victims, and the difficulties of reading a massive, uncurated dump of documents—context that tends to moderate sensational readings but is often absent from viral summaries [5] [7].

5. Verdict and limits of available evidence

Given the material provided here, the defensible conclusion is narrow: the phrase or the concept of a pandemic “simulation” appears in the larger Epstein file release as reported by at least one outlet, and RT attributes detailed specifications and authorship to Bill Gates; however the DOJ release itself is massive, incompletely parsed in public reporting, and mainstream sources included among these documents have not verified that Gates authored a formal “Strain pandemic simulation” or that the files contain the technical deliverables described by RT [1] [2] [3]. Until the specific pages or attachments are identified, authenticated, and corroborated by multiple reputable outlets or the DOJ’s unredacted originals, any stronger claim about authorship or intent exceeds what can be reliably asserted from the sources supplied [6] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
Which specific pages in the DOJ Epstein files mention a 'Strain pandemic simulation' and can they be viewed or authenticated?
What mainstream news outlets have independently verified claims about Bill Gates' involvement in pandemic simulations within the Epstein files?
How have redactions and document formatting in the DOJ release affected attribution and authorship determinations in the Epstein files?