Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

How do estimates of undocumented immigrants in the US vary between different research organizations and government agencies?

Checked on November 4, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.
Searched for:
"undocumented immigrant estimates US Pew Research Center"
"Department of Homeland Security undocumented population estimate"
"Center for Migration Studies unauthorized immigrants methodology"
Found 9 sources

Executive Summary

Estimates of the undocumented immigrant population in the United States differ materially across major research organizations and government agencies, generally clustering between about 11 million and 14 million depending on methods and dates. Key differences stem from the choice of survey (ACS vs CPS), timing (2022 vs 2023), treatment of temporarily protected populations, and methodological adjustments for undercount and sampling error [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. Numbers that jump: Why one headline says 14 million and another says 11 million

Pew Research Center reported a record 14 million unauthorized immigrants for 2023, highlighting a sharp rebound driven in part by growth among those with deportation protections (Temporary Protected Status and similar categories) between 2021 and 2023 [1]. Earlier Pew work placed the 2022 total at 11.0 million, noting a reversal of the prior downward trend and a notable decline in the Mexican unauthorized population to roughly 4.0 million [2]. These two Pew figures illustrate how updated analyses and revised inputs can shift a national estimate by several million within a single research program. Differences of this magnitude reflect the sensitivity of totals to the inclusion or reclassification of protected groups and to model assumptions, and they highlight why contemporary estimates must be read with attention to their exact definitions and cut-off dates [1] [2].

2. Government tallies and systematic reporting: cautious, periodic, and method-driven

Department of Homeland Security and related government products compile multi-year reports and technical estimates but typically present methodological detail and year-by-year reports rather than a single headline figure in the summary texts provided here [5] [6] [7]. The government materials emphasize reproducible methods and the availability of reports across 2015–2022, often requiring users to consult the specific report for a given year. That caution produces consistency but less immediacy: government series are anchored in established methodologies, and adjustments or reinterpretations of special populations (e.g., TPS holders) are methodically documented rather than reflected in rapid headline revisions. The implication is that government series and academic estimates can both be credible while diverging because of policy-driven categorization rules and the cadence of official updates [5] [6] [7].

3. Independent centers plug gaps but expose uncertainty: CMS and MPI approaches

The Center for Migration Studies (CMS) and Migration Policy Institute (MPI) provide alternative, often more frequent provisional estimates drawing on the Current Population Survey (CPS) or American Community Survey (ACS). CMS reported an 11.7 million undocumented population in July 2023 using CPS-derived provisional estimates while cautioning about sampling variability and non-sampling errors [4] [3]. MPI and similar organizations have placed recent estimates in the 11–13.7 million window for 2022–2023, underscoring methodological pluralism [8]. These independent estimates emphasize transparency about statistical uncertainty, and they help researchers and policymakers see a plausible range rather than a single point. The trade-off is that provisional or model-based numbers can shift faster than government series and sometimes conflict with headline claims from large surveys.

4. Methodology matters: sampling frame, undercount adjustments, and population definitions

All the sources note that choice of survey (ACS vs CPS), adjustments for undercount, and definitions of who counts as “unauthorized” are decisive. ACS has larger sample size and is the basis for some government and academic work; CPS is often used for provisional, more frequent snapshots. Adjustments for nonresponse or undercount and decisions about including temporarily protected populations (TPS, DED, parolees) materially affect totals, producing variations of millions [3] [4] [1]. Differences also arise from how models allocate ambiguous cases and how up-to-date the demographic controls are. The presence or absence of explicit error bounds or margin-of-error discussion is a practical indicator of reliability and explains why careful users look to method sections before citing any single-number estimate.

5. What the range means for policy debates and public understanding

A reported range from roughly 11 million to 14 million unauthorized residents changes the policy discourse: a higher figure can amplify arguments for broader regularization or for expanded enforcement, while a lower figure is sometimes used to argue for more limited policy responses [1] [2] [8]. Each research organization displays implicit priorities: Pew emphasizes demographic shifts and provisional rebounds, CMS stresses methodological transparency and provisional CPS-derived estimates, and government reports prioritize reproducibility and documented methods [1] [4] [5]. Readers should therefore treat any single headline as a snapshot within an analytic spectrum, and consult the underlying methodology to understand which populations are included and what the stated uncertainty is [5] [3].

6. Bottom line: use ranges, check definitions, and date-stamp claims

The clearest takeaway is that there is no single uncontested number; credible estimates cluster in a band but vary by method and timing. For 2022–2023, authoritative work locates the undocumented population between about 11.0 million and 14.0 million, with notable mid-range estimates like CMS’s 11.7 million and Pew’s contrasting 11.0 [9] and 14.0 [10] figures illustrating how definitions and data updates shift totals [2] [4] [1]. Analysts and journalists should always cite the report date and the definition used, and where possible present a range with methodological footnotes so readers understand both the central estimate and the uncertainty surrounding it [1] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
How does the Pew Research Center estimate the number of undocumented immigrants in the US (methodology and year)?
What population counts does DHS and USCIS report for unauthorized immigrants and how often are they updated?
How do academic estimates (e.g., Center for Migration Studies, MPI) differ methodologically from federal estimates?
What were estimates of the US undocumented population in 2007, 2010, 2017, and 2023 and why did they change?
How do assumptions about emigration, undercount in ACS/Census, and visa overstays affect undocumented population estimates?