What are scientific explanations for why the horizon appears flat to the naked eye?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The horizon looks flat to human eyes primarily because of perspective and the enormous scale of Earth: an Earth radius of ~6,400 km compared with a person’s height makes the local tangent line essentially straight in ordinary viewing, and the horizon is a circle centered on the observer so its arc projects as a straight line at eye level [1]. Atmospheric refraction and mirages can extend sight “over the horizon,” reinforcing the flat appearance by letting distant objects stay visible longer than simple geometry predicts [2] [3].
1. Why “flat” is just perspective and scale
From a geometric standpoint the horizon is where your line of sight is tangent to the spherical surface — a circle around you — and because Earth’s radius (~6,400 km) dwarfs human size, that circular edge projects to your eye as essentially a straight line; small angular departures are below our visual discrimination at ground level [1]. Space.com phrases this as a human perspective and scale effect: the curvature is present but too slight in everyday circumstances to look curved [4].
2. The horizon is a circle — and circles seen from inside look straight
Analyses on optics and geometry emphasize that an observer standing on a sphere sees the horizon as a circle centered on their position; when you observe that circle from inside its plane, its arc appears almost straight across your field of view, which is why your brain reads the line as flat even when the surface is curved [5] [1].
3. Atmospheric refraction and mirages cheat your eyes
Temperature and density gradients in the lower atmosphere bend light. Superior and inferior mirages can lift images of distant objects or allow you to see parts of a ship after its hull has fallen below the geometrical horizon, producing the illusion that terrain is flatter and more continuous than it is [3]. New Scientist and Physics World note that seeing “over the horizon” is a common source of the flat-Earth impression [2] [3].
4. Seeing curvature requires altitude or long baselines
Historic and modern photography from high altitudes (early high-altitude flights, balloons, aircraft) show curvature — but you must get far above the surface to make the curvature’s drop measurable to the eye or an image sensor. Britannica and Scientific American both note that observing Earth's curvature directly typically requires significant elevation — thousands of meters — because otherwise the tiny angle change is imperceptible [1] [6].
5. Why ships “disappear” the way they do — evidence, but also confusion
Objects like ships vanish hull-first when they move beyond the tangent line; that effect is classic evidence for curvature. But because refraction can make portions visible longer, lay observers may misinterpret intermittent visibility as evidence for flatness rather than refractive distortion combined with geometry [2] [3].
6. Alternative models and why they fail to match observations
Flat-Earth explanations sometimes invoke exotic refractive atmospheres or ad hoc light-bending to reproduce horizons and day–night cycles; such models require contrived physics (e.g., an ether with velocity profiles, constant-height suns) and still fail to match many observations like star-sight changes with latitude, detailed sunset behavior, and global navigation patterns [7] [8] [9]. Reporting highlights that these alternatives tend to pile special-case mechanisms onto phenomena that spherical-Earth geometry explains simply [8] [9].
7. What the sources agree on and where questions remain
Science communicators and journals converge on two plain points: the apparent flat horizon is a perceptual consequence of scale and perspective, and atmospheric refraction modifies what we see and can strengthen the flat impression by letting distant features remain visible [4] [1] [3]. Sources differ when discussing how to counter flat-Earth rhetoric: Space.com focuses on straightforward geometry and demonstrations, while outlets like Physics World and New Scientist emphasize refractive effects that produce counterintuitive sightings [4] [3] [2].
Limitations and final note: available sources do not mention specific angular thresholds for human curvature detection beyond the qualitative points above, and they do not supply psychophysical experiments measuring at what curvature-per-degree humans reliably perceive bend versus straight (not found in current reporting).