How did prices and quality (cvv, track2, bin) of credit card data change between 2023 and 2025 on dark web markets?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Between 2023 and 2025 reported listings show credit-card data (CVV, track2/dumps, BIN/fullz) remained widely available and cheap: studies in 2023 put single card records typically in the $10–$120 range depending on balance and completeness (CVV/fullz command higher prices) and by 2025 aggregated surveys still report US cards averaging $10–$40 and high‑balance cards ~ $110–$120 [1] [2] [3]. Vendor messaging and forum posts across 2023–2025 show persistent marketplaces selling CVV, Track1/2 dumps and “fullz,” with tiered pricing and quality claims that vendors and researchers treat as a core market signal [4] [5] [6].
1. Market snapshot: prices stayed low but stratified by quality
Public price indexes and research in 2023 showed a wide range: basic card details often sold for about $10 in countries such as the U.S., Canada and Australia, while cards with balances or extra data sold for up to ~$110–$240 depending on listing specifics [1] [3]. By 2025 industry summaries still reported US credit cards averaging $10–$40, while niche listings and aggregated charts continued to value high‑balance cards around $110–$120 — a pattern that indicates prices remained low for commodity records but higher for “rich” records whose BIN, balance, CVV and billing data make them actionable [2] [1] [3].
2. What “quality” means on the markets: CVV, track2/dumps, BIN and “fullz”
Sellers and analysts use several quality signals: a CVV present or omitted, full magnetic-track (Track1/Track2) dumps (often with PINs), BIN specificity and “fullz” (cardholder PII like address, SSN) all change value. Research and vendor posts list prices for CVV-enabled records higher than non‑CVV cards and put dumps/track data (usable for cloning/magnetic-stripe attacks) in a different premium band because they enable in‑person cloning or ATM attacks [4] [5] [7].
3. Evidence of seller claims vs. independent measurement
Marketplace posts and forum shops advertise “fresh,” “working” CVV/dumps with tallies and tiered lists (for example country/brand pricing and bulk discounts) — but these are self‑serving signals that vendors use like marketers to justify prices [5] [8]. Independent dark‑web price indexes (PrivacyAffairs, Comparitech reflected in public charts) corroborate the general price bands yet stress that supply growth pushed many prices down in earlier years, driving the commoditization of basic card records [6] [1].
4. Why prices fell historically and why some listings remain expensive
Analysts attribute a long‑term price fall to rising supply and commoditization: more breaches, more scraping and more vendors means basic PAN+expiry lists flood markets and drive prices down [6]. Conversely, cards harder to exploit — e.g., from countries with strong fraud controls, or cards with working CVV, AVS info and balance — command higher fees because they require more effort to cash out or are rarer [7] [2].
5. Technical dynamics shaping quality: EMV, iCVV and track data limitations
Payments technology changes affect what criminals can use. Magnetic-track dumps (Track1/Track2) still appear in sales because they support cloned‑card attacks; however EMV chip features like iCVV or dynamic CVV (which change or are chip‑bound) reduce the value of static CVV or track data for certain attacks. Sources note iCVV/dynamic approaches are designed to limit usefulness of static data stolen from databases or skimmers [9] [10]. Available sources do not mention a quantified, market‑wide price effect directly attributable to dynamic CVV rollout between 2023–2025.
6. Marketcraft and buyer behaviour: packaging, guarantees and bulk discounts
Both researcher reports and underground shop posts describe market practices: bulk sales, “buy two get one” style discounts, and refund/replace guarantees for dead cards — commercial practices that pressure prices and create product tiers [6] [5]. That combination of commodity selling plus premium productization explains simultaneous low average prices and higher niche prices for usable payloads [6] [5].
7. Limits of the record and what’s not in the reporting
Available sources document price bands, seller claims and technology trends, but they do not provide a comprehensive, transaction‑level time series that quantifies precise average price changes month‑by‑month from 2023 to 2025 or verify vendor reliability across markets. Sources do not mention an authoritative inflation‑adjusted index that isolates CVV vs. track2 vs. BIN price shifts across the full period; those datasets are not found in current reporting (not found in current reporting).
8. Takeaway for defenders and policymakers
The durable lesson in both research and marketplace chatter is that basic card records remain cheap and abundant while fully exploitable records remain relatively valuable; technology hardening (dynamic CVV/iCVV, stronger AVS and issuer controls) and reducing usable data exposure directly reduces the premium “quality” criminals pay for — and thus their incentive to monetize breaches [1] [9] [7].