Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the most common types of SNAP benefits abuse?
Executive Summary
The analyses consistently identify trafficking of SNAP benefits, recipient fraud, retailer fraud, and scams involving EBT cards as the most common types of SNAP abuse, with trafficking repeatedly flagged as a distinct and measurable category and estimated to account for roughly 2% of total SNAP benefits in one report [1] [2]. Federal prevention efforts emphasize detection tools, criminal prosecutions, and administrative sanctions, while case reports document large-scale trafficking rings and retailer schemes that have produced multimillion‑dollar losses and felony charges in multiple jurisdictions [3] [4] [5]. The available sources span federal reports, USDA guidance, and investigative news pieces dated from 2024 through mid‑2025, providing both programmatic overviews and concrete enforcement examples that together clarify what is described as the program’s most prevalent misconduct types [6] [7].
1. How officials classify the problem — three headlines that frame SNAP abuse
Federal communications simplify SNAP abuse into recipient fraud, retailer fraud, and external scams, a taxonomy used recently by USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service to guide prevention and penalties [6]. A separate federal analysis expands those categories into five distinct types — trafficking, EBT card misuse, retailer application fraud, household errors/fraud, and state agency errors/fraud — to capture administrative and operational error as well as intentional misconduct [1] [2]. The broader five‑part classification adds context about systemic sources of inaccuracy (for example, state agency mistakes) that the three‑part framing omits, which matters for budgeting, detection, and reform strategies. Both approaches converge on the central idea that selling benefits for cash (trafficking) and retailer schemes are consistently top priorities for enforcement and monitoring [2] [3].
2. Trafficking stands out — scale, method, and enforcement focus
Trafficking — the illegal exchange of SNAP benefits for cash, drugs, or non‑eligible items — is repeatedly singled out and quantified in government reporting as a small but visible share of program outlays, identified in one analysis as about 2% of total SNAP benefits [2]. Trafficking cases typically involve retailer collusion or organized rings that enable recipients to withdraw benefits in cash or buy ineligible goods; enforcement includes undercover buys, transaction monitoring, and criminal referrals [8] [3]. Recent enforcement narratives describe large investigations yielding millions of dollars in alleged theft, with media accounts documenting prosecutions and retailer shutdowns that exemplify the kind of trafficking the USDA prioritizes [4] [5]. The federal ALERT system and specialized trafficking units are central tools used to locate suspect activity in retailer transactions [3] [8].
3. EBT card misuse and scams — technical vulnerabilities and evolving tactics
EBT card fraud and scams encompass card skimming, cloning, and unauthorized transactions, and appear as a distinct concern in both USDA guidance and investigative reporting [6] [4]. The USDA emphasizes technology‑driven monitoring and anti‑fraud analytics to detect suspicious retailer transactions and card anomalies, reflecting a shift toward data surveillance as a frontline defense [3]. News cases show criminals using counterfeit or stolen cards to drain accounts or using retail front‑end schemes to convert benefits into cash, demonstrating that criminal tactics evolve alongside payment technologies, requiring continuous updates to detection methods and retailer controls [4] [1]. The federal perspective frames these scams as both a law‑enforcement issue and a program integrity challenge tied to electronic transaction systems [3].
4. Retailer and household fraud — motives, penalties, and administrative consequences
Retailer fraud covers direct violations by stores — selling ineligible items, cash redemption of benefits, or misrepresenting eligibility in retailer applications — and is a key enforcement target because retailers are gatekeepers to benefit use [1] [6]. Household fraud involves falsified applications, misreported income or household composition, and intentional misuse; penalties range from benefit disqualification and repayment obligations to criminal charges depending on severity [1] [6]. Government materials highlight investigative outcomes and administrative sanctions as primary deterrents, while prosecutorial case reports show both misdemeanor and felony charges for coordinated trafficking or substantial thefts, illustrating how administrative and criminal pathways are used in tandem [6] [7].
5. What the evidence omits and why that matters for policy
The sources provide enforcement examples and program classifications but vary in emphasis: USDA summaries prioritize actionable categories for prevention (recipient/retailer/scams), while audit‑style reports expand into administrative error and agency faults [6] [1]. Media case files illustrate high‑impact criminal rings but cannot quantify routine, small‑scale abuses or false positives from aggressive monitoring [4] [5]. The absence of granular, nationally representative breakdowns beyond the trafficking estimate limits precise assessment of how much each abuse type contributes to total improper payments, which affects resource allocation for prevention versus benefits access reforms [2]. Policymakers must therefore weigh enforcement data alongside program integrity audits and case studies to calibrate interventions that reduce fraud without impeding access for vulnerable households [1] [6].