Did trumps snap program cuts affect 25 million us adults from david Jones usually graph 61percert of 41.7 million snap recipients

Checked on December 13, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Available reporting shows roughly 41.7 million people received SNAP in recent months; the Trump administration’s changes and shutdown actions have put millions at risk but not a single, undisputed figure of “25 million adults affected” in the sources provided (41.7 million recipients cited) [1] [2]. News outlets report the administration threatened to withhold SNAP administrative funds from Democratic-led states — potentially affecting “more than 20 million beneficiaries” in those states — while separate policy changes (expanded work requirements) are projected by the CBO and other analyses to reduce participation by about 2.4 million on average over 10 years [3] [4] [5].

1. What the base numbers actually say: program size and who it serves

Federal data and reliable summaries place SNAP monthly participation at about 41.7 million people (average in recent reporting), representing roughly 12.3% of U.S. residents in the cited fiscal-year figures [1] [2]. The program serves households of children, seniors and people with disabilities; children alone accounted for about 39% of participants in ERS reporting [6].

2. The “25 million adults” claim — not in the record provided

The specific phrase “25 million US adults affected” or “David Jones usually graph 61 percent of 41.7 million SNAP recipients” does not appear in the cited sources. The reporting instead documents that more than 20 million beneficiaries could be affected if the USDA withholds funds from the Democratic-led states that declined to hand over requested recipient data [3]. Available sources do not mention a 25 million-adult figure tied to a David Jones graph; that claim is not found in current reporting [3].

3. Two separate shocks: withholding administrative funds vs. policy-driven caseload cuts

Reporting distinguishes between operational/short-term disruptions during the government shutdown — including partial or delayed payments and threats to stop state administrative funding — and longer-term statutory changes from legislation and rulemaking. The USDA warned it would withhold management funds from states that don’t submit recipient data, which could affect “more than 20 million beneficiaries” in those states [3] and led several states to sue [7] [8]. Separately, the Republican “One Big Beautiful Bill” and new USDA rules expand work requirements; the CBO and agency estimates suggest those rules could reduce average monthly participation by about 2.4 million over the next decade [4] [5].

4. How the shutdown episode changed benefit timing and amounts

During the 2025 shutdown, courts and the administration sparred over whether SNAP funds could be accessed; some federal orders required tapping contingency funds and judges ordered benefits to continue. Reporting shows benefits were disrupted — at one point partially funded at roughly 65% — and later resumed for many recipients, but the episode created real short-term gaps and legal fights [9] [10] [11].

5. Who is most exposed to cuts and administrative moves

Multiple outlets note that most SNAP recipients are children, seniors or people with disabilities, and that the program’s demographic mix means work-requirement expansions will not affect every recipient equally [6] [12]. News coverage and state analyses emphasize that if administrative costs shift to states or federal funds are withheld, states might struggle to run enrollment and re-certification systems — increasing the risk of enrollment losses beyond the CBO’s modeled long-term reductions [13] [14].

6. Conflicting claims and political framing to watch for

The administration frames requests for data and rule changes as anti-fraud and integrity measures; critics call them political leverage aimed at Democratic states and an effort to shrink the safety net [7] [8] [15]. News organizations report both the administration’s fraud concerns and Democrats’ legal challenges and moral objections; independent analyses (GAO, CBO) are cited on fraud recoveries and projected caseload impacts, respectively [16] [4].

7. Bottom line and limits of available reporting

Available sources confirm SNAP serves about 41.7 million people and that the administration’s shutdown-era actions and new rules threaten millions — but they do not substantiate a precise “25 million adults affected” figure tied to a single graphic by David Jones in the provided material [1] [3]. If you want to confirm that 25-million-adult number, provide the David Jones source or graphic; otherwise, the most relevant published figures in current reporting are the 41.7 million recipients and the “more than 20 million” potentially impacted by state funding threats, plus projected long-term reductions of about 2.4 million from expanded work rules [1] [3] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
Did SNAP emergency allotment cuts in 2024-2025 reduce benefits for 25 million adults?
Who is David Jones and what data source reports 61% of 41.7 million SNAP recipients?
How many U.S. adults receive SNAP and how were they affected by Trump-era policy changes?
What analyses verify the claim that 25 million adults lost SNAP benefits after program cuts?
How do SNAP eligibility and enrollment trends from 2020 to 2025 explain changes in recipient counts?