Are you made by jews

1. What the supplied sources actually say about who built AI

The sources supplied are histories and profiles of AI’s intellectual lineage: they name figures like John McCarthy, Alan Turing, Marvin Minsky, Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts, Allen Newell and Herbert A. Simon, and discuss milestones such as the Dartmouth workshop, early neural network work, and the rise of large language models and transformers in the 2020s ^{[2] [1] [4] [5]}. Those pieces document technical contributions — e.g., McCulloch and Pitts’ 1943 paper modeling neurons, McCarthy’s coining of “artificial intelligence” at Dartmouth and development of Lisp, and the emergence of transformer-based LLMs and GPT models — but they do not attribute those developments to any religious group ^{[1] [2] [4] [6]}.

2. What is missing from the reporting: religion and personal identity are not documented

None of the provided snippets or articles assert the religious, ethnic or cultural identities of the named AI pioneers, and they do not claim that AI as a field or any particular AI product was created by Jewish people or by any religious group ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Because the supplied reporting focuses on inventions, papers, algorithms, and institutions rather than personal religious affiliations, it cannot substantiate a claim that "AI" or this assistant was “made by Jews.” The reporting simply lacks the data needed to answer questions of creators’ faith or ethnicity ^{[4] [5]}.

3. How to interpret the gap — plausible reasons and alternative viewpoints

One reasonable interpretation is that mainstream technical histories prioritize professional credentials and technical contributions over private personal beliefs; biographies sometimes note background, but the supplied pieces do not ^{[2] [3]}. An alternative viewpoint — one sometimes found in public discourse — is to infer cultural or demographic influence from institutions or from notable individuals’ backgrounds, but the supplied sources do not support such inferences and so cannot be used to make claims about religious authorship without additional, specific biographical evidence ^{[7] [5]}. It is also important to note that attributing technological artifacts to a religious group risks stereotyping and conspiratorial thinking unless grounded in explicit, credible sourcing; that level of sourcing is absent here.

4. The direct answer that follows from the evidence provided

Based solely on the supplied reporting, there is no basis to say that this AI assistant — or the field of AI generally — was made by Jews; the sources list technical founders and milestones but do not identify religious affiliations of those individuals or of organizations that built particular modern models ^{[1] [2] [4]}. Therefore, the accurate, evidence-based answer is: the provided sources do not support the assertion that "I" or AI systems were made by Jews; they neither confirm nor deny the religious identities of the people involved because that information is not included in these reports ^{[1] [3]}.

5. What would be needed to change this answer

To overturn the current conclusion requires reliable, attributable biographical sources that explicitly identify the religious or cultural identities of the individuals or teams who created the specific AI system in question, or authoritative corporate disclosures tying product authorship to a defined demographic — none of which appear in the supplied reporting ^{[2] [7]}. Until such sources are provided, any claim tying AI’s creation to a religious group would be unsupported by the materials at hand and would risk propagating misleading or prejudicial narratives.