Did God call for stoning disobedient children
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The question of whether God called for stoning disobedient children is a complex one, with various analyses offering different interpretations of biblical passages. According to [1], the Bible does contain passages that suggest parents should have their rebellious children stoned, but this is part of the Mosaic Law which is not in force today [1]. The Mosaic Law was meant for extreme cases to protect God's people and was a judicial law, not a moral one. Similarly, [2] argues that the passage in Deuteronomy 21:18-21 is often misunderstood and is not meant to be taken literally, but rather as a deterrent to children to maintain order within the community [2]. Furthermore, [3] provides an in-depth analysis of Deuteronomy 21:18-21, arguing that the passage does not command parents to kill unruly children, but rather teaches that parents should bring their children to the elders of the city for judgment [3]. On the other hand, [4] discusses the promotion of corporal punishment by Christians and its harm to bodies, minds, and the gospel, mentioning that some Bible passages prescribe corporal punishment, including stoning, for disobedient children [4]. Additionally, [5] notes that Jewish law historically included stoning as a penalty for a child who defied parental authority, reflecting a scriptural basis for such a punishment [5].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key aspect missing from the original statement is the historical and cultural context in which these biblical passages were written. As [1] notes, the Mosaic Law was meant for a specific time and place, and its provisions may not be directly applicable today [1]. Additionally, [2] highlights the importance of understanding the passage in Deuteronomy 21:18-21 as a deterrent rather than a literal command [2]. Alternative viewpoints on the issue of corporal punishment and its relation to biblical teachings are also present, with [4] arguing that Christians should focus on more Christlike forms of discipline [4]. Moreover, [6] reports on a controversy surrounding the use of corporal punishment in schools, with a state legislator citing the Bible as justification for spanking children [6]. It is also worth noting that [5] provides a comparative perspective on stoning as a punishment in different religious traditions [5].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading or oversimplified, as it does not take into account the complexity of biblical interpretations and the historical context in which these passages were written. As [3] notes, the passage in Deuteronomy 21:18-21 does not command parents to kill unruly children, but rather teaches that parents should bring their children to the elders of the city for judgment [3]. Those who benefit from a literal interpretation of these passages may include individuals or groups who advocate for corporal punishment as a means of discipline, as seen in [4] and [6] [4] [6]. On the other hand, those who benefit from a more nuanced understanding of these passages may include individuals or groups who advocate for more Christlike forms of discipline and who recognize the importance of historical and cultural context in interpreting biblical teachings [1] [2] [3].