Fact check: What is the full name of the woman BIG Balls saved from assault?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the comprehensive analysis of multiple news sources, the full name of the woman that Edward "BIG Balls" Coristine saved from assault is not publicly available. All sources consistently report that the woman's identity has been protected by both law enforcement and media outlets ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]}.

The sources uniformly describe the woman as:

• Coristine's significant other ^{[4] [5] [6] [2]}
• A woman in a car at night in DC during the incident ^{[2] [3]}
• An unnamed woman who was with Coristine during the attempted carjacking ^[1]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question assumes that the woman's full name should be publicly known and available, but the analyses reveal important privacy considerations that explain why this information is not disclosed:

• Law enforcement protection protocols - Police have deliberately identified the woman only as "Coristine's significant other" rather than releasing her name ^{[4] [5] [6]}
• Media ethics standards - News organizations across the political spectrum (Fox News, NBC, The Independent, Newsweek, Hindustan Times) have all chosen not to publish the woman's identity ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]}
• Victim privacy rights - The woman was a victim of an attempted assault/carjacking, and standard journalistic practice protects crime victims' identities unless they choose to go public

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains an implicit assumption that may be problematic:

• Expectation of public disclosure - The question presumes that a crime victim's full name should be publicly available, which contradicts established privacy protections for assault victims
• Potential privacy violation intent - Seeking the personal identifying information of a private citizen who was victimized in a crime raises ethical concerns about doxxing or harassment
• Misunderstanding of reporting standards - The question may reflect unfamiliarity with standard media practices that protect victims' identities while still reporting on newsworthy events

The consistent pattern across all analyzed sources suggests that responsible journalism and law enforcement protocols are being followed by not releasing the woman's personal information, regardless of the high-profile nature of the case involving a Trump administration staffer.