Fact check: Who got rich of of Black live matter

1. Summary of the results

The question of who got rich off of the Black Lives Matter movement is complex and multifaceted, with various sources providing different insights ^[1]. According to some analyses, the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation has taken in significant amounts of money, with one report stating that it received over $90 million in donations ^[2]. However, it is unclear how much of this money has gone towards charitable causes, with one source reporting that only 33% of donations have been allocated to charities, while executives have been paid millions ^[3]. Some individuals, such as Sir Maejor Page, have been found to have exploited the movement for personal financial gain, with Page being sentenced to prison for wire fraud and money laundering after defrauding donors of over $450,000 ^[4]. The purchase of a $6 million mansion by Black Lives Matter leaders has also raised concerns about the organization's financial management and transparency ^[5]. Key points to note include the lack of transparency in the organization's financial dealings, the significant amounts of money being paid to executives, and the exploitation of the movement by some individuals for personal gain.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some sources suggest that the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation is focused on reinvesting into Black communities, which could be a positive use of funds ^[2]. However, other sources raise concerns about the transparency and accountability of the organization, including its leadership and financial management ^[6]. Alternative viewpoints include the idea that the organization's use of funds for security and other purposes is justified, with some supporters defending the purchase of the $6 million mansion ^[5]. Additionally, the fact that the organization's 990 forms and audits are available to the public suggests a level of transparency, although some sources argue that more information is needed to fully understand the organization's financial activities ^[1]. Missing context includes the specific details of how the organization's funds are being allocated, as well as the perspectives of Black Lives Matter leaders and supporters on the controversy surrounding the organization's finances. Some possible questions to consider include:

• What are the specific uses of the $90 million in donations received by the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation?
• How do the organization's leaders respond to concerns about financial transparency and accountability?
• What are the perspectives of Black Lives Matter supporters on the controversy surrounding the organization's finances?

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement implies that certain individuals have gotten rich off of the Black Lives Matter movement, which may be an oversimplification of the issue ^[3]. While it is true that some individuals, such as Sir Maejor Page, have exploited the movement for personal financial gain, it is unclear whether this is a widespread problem ^[4]. The statement may be biased towards a negative view of the Black Lives Matter movement, and could be seen as an attempt to discredit the organization. Additionally, the lack of transparency in the organization's financial dealings may be contributing to the controversy surrounding its finances, and some sources may be benefiting from the negative attention by highlighting the organization's flaws ^[3]. Those who benefit from this framing include critics of the Black Lives Matter movement, who may be using the controversy surrounding the organization's finances to undermine its credibility. On the other hand, those who may be harmed by this framing include Black Lives Matter supporters and leaders, who may be unfairly maligned by the negative attention ^[5].