Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: The percent of black murders
Executive Summary
The core factual claim extracted from the materials is that Black people comprised about 62% of murder victims in North Carolina in 2023, based on a state law-enforcement summary that lists 535 Black victims out of 858 total victims (approximately 62%) [1]. The available documents do not provide a national percentage for Black murder victims; federal or national homicide breakdowns are absent from the supplied sources, and a CDC report included in the materials covers suicide trends rather than homicide [2].
1. A single-state statistic that grabs headlines — but don’t treat it as national truth
The North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation’s 2023 summary is precise: 535 Black murder victims out of 858 total victims, about 62% [1]. This is an authoritative count for the state and year reported, and the publication date of the dataset is December 9, 2025, which makes it recent relative to the materials provided [1]. However, the dataset’s scope is limited to North Carolina and cannot be extrapolated directly to the United States without additional, representative national data; the supplied materials contain no national homicide breakdown to support broader claims [1].
2. An unrelated federal dataset included by mistake — note the mismatch
Two of the supplied analyses reference a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report, but that CDC document tracks suicide rates by race and ethnicity through 2018–2023, not homicide or murder statistics [2]. The CDC analysis shows differing suicide trends across demographic groups and emphasizes prevention strategies; it does not provide any figures on murders or murder victims and therefore cannot corroborate or contradict the North Carolina homicide percentage [2] [3]. Treat the CDC material as context on racial disparities in mortality from another cause, not as evidence about homicides.
3. Context on racial disparities in criminal justice — supports broader concerns but not the percentage
Separate materials in the packet discuss systemic racial disparities in the U.S. criminal justice system, noting disproportionate justice involvement for people of color and historical patterns of discrimination [4] [5]. These analyses underline that disproportionality is a documented phenomenon, which provides context for why a high proportion of Black homicide victims might be observed in a given jurisdiction. Still, the provided pieces do not quantify national homicide victimization by race and therefore do not validate a claim that the North Carolina percentage reflects a nationwide rate [4] [5].
4. Dates and provenance matter — recent state data vs. thematic federal essays
The North Carolina figures are dated December 9, 2025, making them the most recent homicide-count data among the supplied sources [1]. The CDC suicide reports are from September 2025 and are topical but thematically different [2]. The commentary on racial disparities and mass incarceration dates from September and October 2025 and offers historical and structural framing rather than incident-level statistics [4] [5]. Different publication dates and data types warrant careful separation when synthesizing claims.
5. What’s missing from the packet — national homicide breakdowns and perpetrator context
None of the provided sources contain a national homicide victimization percentage by race or the typical FBI/NIBRS-style national tables that would be needed for U.S.-level claims. The materials also lack breakdowns by age, urban/rural location, victim–offender relationships, or socioeconomic indicators that would help interpret why a jurisdiction like North Carolina might show a 62% share of Black victims in 2023 [1] [4]. Omitted contextual variables limit causal interpretation of the single-state percentage.
6. Multiple viewpoints and likely agendas — data, public-health framing, and systemic critique
The packet contains three distinct framings: crime-statistics reporting (North Carolina law-enforcement counts), public-health surveillance (CDC suicide trends), and systemic racial-disparities analysis (incarceration and race summaries) [1] [2] [4]. Each serves a different institutional agenda: accurate incident counts for criminal-justice oversight, prevention-focused analysis for public health, and structural critique for policy advocacy. Recognizing these differing aims helps explain why the CDC pieces do not serve as homicide evidence and why the state report stands alone as the only direct homicide dataset [1] [2] [4].
7. Bottom line for the original statement and next steps for verification
The supplied evidence supports the specific claim that Black people were roughly 62% of murder victims in North Carolina in 2023 [1]. The materials do not support any assertion about national percentages, trends, or causes, and they lack necessary contextual variables. To verify broader claims, one should seek national homicide victimization tables (FBI Uniform Crime Reporting/NIBRS or CDC homicide-specific datasets) and demographic breakdowns by jurisdiction, age, and victim–offender relationship, none of which are present in the current packet [1].