Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How has California's population changed since the 2020 census?
Executive Summary
California’s population picture since the 2020 census is mixed: the state experienced a sharp drop and major domestic out-migration in 2021–2022, then returned to modest growth by 2023–2024 driven largely by falls in mortality and a rebound in legal international immigration, producing a net increase that almost recovered pre-pandemic totals [1] [2] [3]. Different data frames yield contrasting emphases — short-term rebound in 2023–2024 versus a longer-term slide since the 2020 peak — so the most accurate statement is that California peaked in 2020, dipped through 2021–2022, and has shown modest recovery since 2023 while remaining vulnerable to continued domestic outflow [4] [5].
1. A dramatic post-2020 dip stunned demographers — Californians left in droves
Between 2021 and 2022 California recorded substantial net domestic out-migration, with datasets and reportage documenting several hundred thousand residents leaving for other states, producing a pronounced population decline from the 2020 high. Multiple accounts quantify outflows: one analysis detailed roughly 818,000 departures in that window and a net loss near 342,000 attributable to domestic moves, while broader summaries cite a net outflow of roughly 407,000 between July 2021 and July 2022, emphasizing cost-driven migration to lower-cost Sun Belt states [6] [1]. These figures underpin claims of a population “drain” and explain why the state’s population did not simply continue the pre-2020 upward trajectory; they also set the stage for later recovery dynamics and political debates about economic competitiveness and fiscal impacts.
2. The turning point: 2023 showed the first net gain since 2020, led by immigration and lower mortality
After the 2021–2022 losses, California reversed course in 2023, posting a net population increase of about 67,000 people (roughly 0.17 percent), according to contemporaneous reporting and datasets that credited a decline in mortality and a rebound in legal foreign immigration as the principal drivers [2] [4]. Reports highlight that legal foreign immigration produced a net gain — one figure cites +114,200 — and that domestic outflows slowed, which together shifted the balance to positive natural and migratory change [2] [4]. This recovery narrative is reinforced by later summaries that describe a “rebound” in 2024 adding almost a quarter-million residents and bringing totals nearly back to pre-pandemic levels, even as domestic migration losses remained the largest in the nation [3].
3. Numbers matter: where totals sit now and what projections show for the near term
Recent datasets place California’s population in the 39.4 million range by 2024 (an increase of about 0.59% from 2023 in one update), while state fact sheets round to roughly 39.0 million as a base and project gradual growth to 39.7 million by 2030 and 40.9 million by 2040 under current trends [5] [7]. These figures reconcile the short-term rebound with a longer-term pattern: California’s population peaked in 2020, experienced a decline, then modest recovery, yet growth rates remain slower than many competitor states and long-term net migration outflows since 2000 exceed four million people in some tallies [5] [8]. The juxtaposition of near-term gains and longer-run competitive challenges frames policy and planning conversations about housing, labor, and revenue.
4. Conflicting emphases reflect differing choices of timeframe and metric
Analyses that headline “California grew in 2023” rely on year-over-year counts that capture the immediate rebound from 2022 losses, focusing on drivers like immigration and mortality decline [2] [4]. Conversely, narratives claiming continued decline emphasize cumulative losses since the 2020 peak or multi-decade net out-migration and slower growth rates compared with states such as Texas and Arizona [8] [1]. Both frames are factually supported by the available data: one documents the return to positive net change in 2023–2024, the other documents a structural retreat from the 2020 peak and long-term competitive concerns, so the apparent contradiction dissolves when the timeframe and metrics are made explicit [3] [5].
5. Political and policy implications — who benefits from which narrative?
Different stakeholders emphasize different parts of the record: advocates and officials citing recovery point to the 2023–2024 rebound to argue that population loss is reversible and tied to temporary shocks, while critics and competitors underscore the long-term net outflows and slower growth to argue California faces structural disadvantages affecting jobs, housing, and fiscal capacity [3] [8]. Both uses are grounded in the same datasets but are selected to support policy priorities: short-term wins for restoring services and revenues versus long-term reform agendas addressing affordability and business climate. Recognizing both valid readings is essential for crafting responses that match the underlying demographic realities rather than a single headline.