Charlie Kirk said women should go to college to get their MRS degree
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The statement that Charlie Kirk said women should go to college to get their MRS degree is supported by multiple sources [1] [2] [3], which report that he encouraged young women to attend college for the purpose of finding husbands, referencing the 'MRS degree' as a valid reason for attending college [1]. These sources suggest that Charlie Kirk's comments were made in the context of advising a 14-year-old girl about attending college, with some sources stating that he suggested bringing back the 'MRS degree' [1]. However, other sources do not support this claim [4] [5] [6], instead discussing research on the marriage market for college-educated women and changing preferences in choosing a husband [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Some key context is missing from the original statement, including the fact that Charlie Kirk's comments were made in a specific context, such as advising a 14-year-old girl [1], and that his statement may have been intended to spark discussion or controversy rather than being a serious policy proposal [2]. Alternative viewpoints are also present, such as the idea that college-educated women are changing their preferences when choosing a husband, with many opting to marry men without a college degree who have good financial prospects [5]. Additionally, some sources argue in favor of marriage and family, citing research that shows married mothers are more likely to report being 'very happy' and having a sense of purpose in life [6]. The concept of the 'MRS degree' itself is also discussed by some sources, which provide context to its existence and the stereotype surrounding it [7].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading or biased because it does not provide context for Charlie Kirk's comments, which could be seen as taken out of context [1]. Additionally, the statement may be sensationalized to spark outrage or controversy, rather than providing a nuanced discussion of the issue [2]. Some sources may benefit from presenting Charlie Kirk's comments in a certain light, such as to criticize his views on women's education or to promote a particular agenda [3]. On the other hand, other sources may benefit from downplaying or omitting Charlie Kirk's comments, such as to avoid controversy or to promote a more nuanced discussion of the issue [4]. It is also possible that Charlie Kirk's comments were intended to be provocative or to spark discussion, rather than being a serious policy proposal [2].